/p/ - Photography » Thread #4145122

[69 / 11 / 26]

283KiB, 1600x1600, canon-ef-24-105-f-4-l-is-usm-standardni--101079_3.jpg

Anonymous Wed 22 Feb 2023 06:11:14 No.4145122 View View Reply Original Report

Quoted By: >>4145123 >>4145215 >>4145320 >>4145505 >>4145506 >>4145508 >>4145868 >>4145870 >>4145999 >>4150994 >>4151565

Let me guess, you "need" more?

Anonymous

Anonymous Wed 22 Feb 2023 06:13:32 No.4145123 Report

Quoted By: >>4145205

>>4145122
I wouldn't if it was f/2.8. f/4 isn't wide enough for my low light shots, I tried.

Anonymous

Anonymous Wed 22 Feb 2023 06:21:48 No.4145131 Report

Quoted By:

>canon
you can keep it dad

Anonymous

Anonymous Wed 22 Feb 2023 08:53:01 No.4145205 Report

Quoted By: >>4145220

>>4145123
>muh low light shot
post one

Anonymous

Anonymous Wed 22 Feb 2023 08:57:45 No.4145211 Report

Quoted By:

How close does it focus?

Anonymous

Anonymous Wed 22 Feb 2023 09:01:00 No.4145215 Report

Quoted By: >>4145218 >>4146010

>>4145122
why use this when you're just gonna naturally zoom to 50mm anyway which i'm sure is much cheaper and f/1.8?

Let me guess, YOU need more than a nifty fifty?
>pathetic nophoto

Anonymous

Anonymous Wed 22 Feb 2023 09:04:54 No.4145218 Report

Quoted By: >>4145221 >>4145313

>>4145215
Nifty fifty's don't focus close enough.

Anonymous

View Same Google ImgOps iqdb SauceNAO 0281.jpg, 2MiB, 1568x2352

Anonymous Wed 22 Feb 2023 09:07:32 No.4145220 Report

Quoted By: >>4145302 >>4145345

>>4145205
okay

Anonymous

Anonymous Wed 22 Feb 2023 09:08:52 No.4145221 Report

Quoted By: >>4145224

>>4145218
Canon 24-105
minimum focus distance
>45cm
max magnification
>x0.23
Canon 50mm f/1.8 min focus distance
>35cm
max magnification
>x0.21
bad troll is bad

Anonymous

Anonymous Wed 22 Feb 2023 09:09:58 No.4145224 Report

Quoted By: >>4145225

>>4145221
Those are both very bad reproduction ratios. How am I trolling?

Anonymous

Anonymous Wed 22 Feb 2023 09:11:26 No.4145225 Report

Quoted By: >>4145226

>>4145224
>t. can't into comprehension or continuous train of thought
nvm

Anonymous

Anonymous Wed 22 Feb 2023 09:14:52 No.4145226 Report

Quoted By: >>4145228

>>4145225
I asked about minimum focus distance before you even replied to the thread. You're the one with comprehension and continuity issues.

Anonymous

Anonymous Wed 22 Feb 2023 09:16:26 No.4145228 Report

Quoted By: >>4145229

>>4145226
/p/ doesn't had post id's I don't know who the fuck you are, I was replying to OP, stay the fuck out of it if you're going to be a schizo

Anonymous

Anonymous Wed 22 Feb 2023 09:18:48 No.4145229 Report

Quoted By: >>4145234 >>4145693

>>4145228
You need post id's to keep track of ideas in a thread with 6 people in it and only 12 replies?

And I'm the one with comprehension problems?

Anonymous

Anonymous Wed 22 Feb 2023 09:22:22 No.4145234 Report

Quoted By: >>4145237

>>4145229
I didn't read your pathetic post and i didn't quote it, i was replying to OP, go fuck off you schizo, no one cares about macro when high mp exists

Anonymous

Anonymous Wed 22 Feb 2023 09:24:09 No.4145237 Report

Quoted By: >>4145241

>>4145234
You're a retard if you think digital cropping replaces macro.

You're also a retard if you think a nifty fifty is a suitable replacement for a 24-whatever zoom. You're also poor and coping.

Fuck off, newfag retard.

Anonymous

Anonymous Wed 22 Feb 2023 09:27:01 No.4145239 Report

Quoted By: >>4145243

yes I need something with distance marks for the focus

Anonymous

Anonymous Wed 22 Feb 2023 09:30:06 No.4145241 Report

Quoted By: >>4145245

>>4145237
>nifty fifty is a suitable replacement for a 24-whatever zoom
yes, zooms are always a compomise in quality where as with a 50mm a simple step back or forward can literally replace any focal length except super tele's, I'm starting to think you've never actually left your house to take photos
>lol, lmao even

Anonymous

View Same Google ImgOps iqdb SauceNAO focusmarks.png, 3KiB, 421x77

Anonymous Wed 22 Feb 2023 09:31:07 No.4145243 Report

Quoted By: >>4145244

>>4145239
there's a little window right in the middle numbnuts

Anonymous

Anonymous Wed 22 Feb 2023 09:31:54 No.4145244 Report

Quoted By:

>>4145243
wait, how to view deleted posts? I want to humiliate pseuds also

Anonymous

Anonymous Wed 22 Feb 2023 09:33:39 No.4145245 Report

Quoted By: >>4145248

>>4145241
How did I know you were going to be a "le zoom with your feet" retard before you even said it?

Kill yourself. Seriously.

Anonymous

Anonymous Wed 22 Feb 2023 09:35:26 No.4145248 Report

Quoted By: >>4145259

>>4145245
but I've actually taken photos and that crippling anxiety you felt when confronted about bullshitting on topics you know nothing about

Anonymous

View Same Google ImgOps iqdb SauceNAO 2861484619_c1624fa765_o.jpg, 255KiB, 1200x797

Anonymous Wed 22 Feb 2023 09:49:06 No.4145259 Report

Quoted By: >>4145263 >>4145296

>>4145248
You haven't, actually. You're projecting your own insecurities about yourself onto me because you know you're both full of shit and a failure.

Here's a random photo I've taken, likely while you were still in diapers or grade school. I've got ten thousand more that I can dredge up at a moment's notice. Feel free to post one of your foot-zoomed nifty fifty photos that can replace a 24mm photo or a macro.

I'll wait, or you'll just never deliver because, as always, I'm right and you're wrong.

Anonymous

Anonymous Wed 22 Feb 2023 10:02:29 No.4145263 Report

Quoted By: >>4145278

>>4145259
>be 45 year old man
>come to 4chan to argue with children
>lose argument to said child
>get mad about it
Stop. Just stop. Jesus dude.

Anonymous

View Same Google ImgOps iqdb SauceNAO DSC_7079v2v2.jpg, 556KiB, 1766x1179

Anonymous Wed 22 Feb 2023 10:20:11 No.4145278 Report

Quoted By: >>4145282 >>4151036

>>4145263
There it is. Deflect, attack me for idiotic shit, insist that you "won" etc.

Anything but post a photo, right?

Anonymous

Anonymous Wed 22 Feb 2023 10:24:45 No.4145282 Report

Quoted By: >>4145285

>>4145278
I'm not him I just was scrolling by. Reexamine your fucking life you miserable shack of shit.

Anonymous

Anonymous Wed 22 Feb 2023 10:27:23 No.4145285 Report

Quoted By:

>>4145282
No photo, don't care what you have to say. Eat my ass, fuckwit.

Anonymous

View Same Google ImgOps iqdb SauceNAO TrueMacro.png, 2MiB, 1605x814

Anonymous Wed 22 Feb 2023 10:37:02 No.4145296 Report

Quoted By: >>4145299 >>4145860

>>4145259
>focal length 55mm
lol i knew it was fucking kit lens, 18-55mm why are you arguing for something you're not using?

Also here's a crop macro from your not so macro photo, you're welcome, you can do this on any lens btw

Anonymous

Anonymous Wed 22 Feb 2023 10:42:01 No.4145299 Report

Quoted By: >>4145301

>>4145296
Nope, that’s a crop. Not macro.

Post one of your photos. I’ll wait.

Anonymous

Anonymous Wed 22 Feb 2023 10:45:06 No.4145301 Report

Quoted By: >>4145311

>>4145299
lol you're using a crop sensor, any of your macros by definition are crop
>LOLOLOLLOOLOLOLOLOLOLOL

Anonymous

View Same Google ImgOps iqdb SauceNAO IMG_1312.jpg, 4MiB, 4032x3024

Anonymous Wed 22 Feb 2023 10:50:42 No.4145302 Report

Quoted By: >>4145304

>>4145220
>dogshit photo
>could just as well used a tripod, no need for an actually bright lens
lol, like always the gearfags that "need" le epic bright lenses just take handheld worthless photos of lamp posts at night.
very curious that nobody ever posts a photo that was actually good and needed a bright lens to be achieved.
here, a random pic taken with a phone without sperging about the lack of much bright L glass

Anonymous

Anonymous Wed 22 Feb 2023 10:53:05 No.4145304 Report

Quoted By: >>4145308

>>4145302
>post good photo on /p/
yeah nah lol i save those for paying clients

Anonymous

Anonymous Wed 22 Feb 2023 11:03:49 No.4145308 Report

Quoted By:

>>4145304
yeah, all those real clients that can't stop asking about taking photos in the fucking dark LOL

Anonymous

Anonymous Wed 22 Feb 2023 11:08:24 No.4145311 Report

Quoted By: >>4145312

>>4145301
The other pic was full frame you retard.

Post a pic.

Anonymous

Anonymous Wed 22 Feb 2023 11:10:57 No.4145312 Report

Quoted By: >>4145318

>>4145311
what other pic? the one without exif? how convenient

Anonymous

View Same Google ImgOps iqdb SauceNAO Screenshot_20230222-121225.jpg, 138KiB, 1152x1207

Anonymous Wed 22 Feb 2023 11:14:39 No.4145313 Report

Quoted By: >>4145314

>>4145218
>Solves you are problems

Anonymous

Anonymous Wed 22 Feb 2023 11:16:20 No.4145314 Report

Quoted By:

>>4145313
based

Anonymous

Anonymous Wed 22 Feb 2023 11:21:41 No.4145318 Report

Quoted By: >>4145321

>>4145312
Yep. Nikon D800. The raw has been posted here before.

Post a pic.

Anonymous

Anonymous Wed 22 Feb 2023 11:26:30 No.4145320 Report

Quoted By: >>4150174 >>4150994

>>4145122
Jesus, Canon simply makes the ugliest fucking gear across the board. They might be marginally less behind the times than, say, Pentax, but they sure make even Pentax stuff look comparatively cool.

Anonymous

Anonymous Wed 22 Feb 2023 11:32:13 No.4145321 Report

Quoted By: >>4145466

>>4145318
>no exif data
yep keep larping i'm going to work

Anonymous

Anonymous Wed 22 Feb 2023 12:26:47 No.4145345 Report

Quoted By:

>>4145220
>no moving subject
just use a tripod

Anonymous

View Same Google ImgOps iqdb SauceNAO 71rcTKaGeuL._AC_SY450_.jpg, 48KiB, 774x450

Anonymous Wed 22 Feb 2023 13:28:33 No.4145354 Report

Quoted By:

Anonymous

Anonymous Wed 22 Feb 2023 13:33:25 No.4145355 Report

Quoted By: >>4145372

The RF 24-105 f/4 is such an unbelievably shit lens for what is supposed to be an L-series and how much it costs

Anonymous

Anonymous Wed 22 Feb 2023 14:54:08 No.4145372 Report

Quoted By:

>>4145355
True. It also used to cost $899. Then a year ago they suddenly raised the price by $400.

Anonymous

Anonymous Wed 22 Feb 2023 16:35:26 No.4145394 Report

Quoted By:

>zooms
Gay. Walk.
>50mm
Oooh watch out it’s HCB! Gay. Chads shoot 40mm.

Anonymous

Anonymous Wed 22 Feb 2023 19:43:49 No.4145466 Report

Quoted By:

>>4145321
https://drive.google.com/file/d/18iJfBnZCNqcGoonY6jhcZrIgZdL5DNqK/view?usp=sharing

Here you go, fuckwit.

Now post a pic. We all know you won't.

Anonymous

Anonymous Wed 22 Feb 2023 20:54:50 No.4145505 Report

Quoted By:

>>4145122
>zoomers

Anonymous

Anonymous Wed 22 Feb 2023 20:54:54 No.4145506 Report

Quoted By:

>>4145122
An r5 and 28-70 f2 could cover 90% of my shooting needs. It's much more fun to have a wide variety of cameras and lenses to use.

Anonymous

Anonymous Wed 22 Feb 2023 21:01:18 No.4145508 Report

Quoted By:

>>4145122
>giant dslr
>giant zoom lens with stabilization
i need less

one small mirrorless body with ibis and a f2-f2.8 prime or two, please

Anonymous

Anonymous Wed 22 Feb 2023 21:03:17 No.4145510 Report

Quoted By:

i unironically use the rf version for pretty much all my pics

Anonymous

Anonymous Thu 23 Feb 2023 05:33:47 No.4145693 Report

Quoted By: >>4145759

>>4145229
nta but every board should have post ids and flags in 2023 ffs, hiroshimoot, stop being a cheap piece of shit.

Anonymous

Anonymous Thu 23 Feb 2023 05:38:41 No.4145696 Report

Quoted By: >>4145722 >>4151040 >>4151042

OP lens vs 24-240 for "one lens for everything" vacation snapshit use? only zooms i have are rf 15-35 which while a great lens, doesn't feel liike it'd be super useful, and an adapted 70-200/2.8 which would be a pain to lug on international flight. oh and the ef 11-24 lol. the idea of the 24-240 is alluring, but it seems highly overpriced to me, non-L and poor fstops.

Anonymous

Anonymous Thu 23 Feb 2023 07:10:25 No.4145722 Report

Quoted By: >>4145726

>>4145696
Which 24-240 lens specifically? Are you using it on FF or crop? Most zooms with that wide of range aren't super sharp, so if sharpness is a big deal to you you should get something with a more limited range of focal lengths. It also depends on how often you shoot in the 106-240mm focal length. Personally I normally use a two lens setup. But if I had to fly with it I would accept lower optical performance and just do a single lens

Anonymous

Anonymous Thu 23 Feb 2023 07:14:26 No.4145726 Report

Quoted By: >>4145728 >>4151042

>>4145722
I was thinking of the RF 24-240 specifically since I don’t have a “standard zoom” for my eos R, I figured if I have to buy one, may as well get one with more range if it’s just for travel snapshits no? I’ve travelled with my full kit before and it became such a pain that I ended up not using the majority of it, just the nifty fifty and my Sony rx100iv lol. I suppose I could just do that again.

Anonymous

Anonymous Thu 23 Feb 2023 07:18:38 No.4145728 Report

Quoted By:

>>4145726
I guess the second consideration is how often you travel. If you only go on vacation once every couple years, I would definitely buy a better performing standard zoom, but if you travel frequently maybe it is worth it.

Anonymous

Anonymous Thu 23 Feb 2023 09:15:43 No.4145759 Report

Quoted By:

>>4145693
I actually agree, every board would be dramatically improved by thread id's.

Anonymous

Anonymous Thu 23 Feb 2023 15:36:53 No.4145860 Report

Quoted By:

>>4145296
>>focal length 55mm
>lol i knew it was fucking kit lens, 18-55mm
https://www.nikonusa.com/en/nikon-products/product/camera-lenses/micro-nikkor-55mm-f%252f2.8.html

Anonymous

Anonymous Thu 23 Feb 2023 16:03:48 No.4145868 Report

Quoted By:

>>4145122
Honestly, thats a great lens, and is always in my bag. But i mostly opt for the 70-200 f/2.8

Anonymous

Anonymous Thu 23 Feb 2023 16:05:47 No.4145870 Report

Quoted By:

>>4145122
The sony 24-105 f4 is smaller thus better

Anonymous

View Same Google ImgOps iqdb SauceNAO 4909254271_1e426e7444_b.jpg, 117KiB, 1024x683

Anonymous Thu 23 Feb 2023 22:26:26 No.4145999 Report

Quoted By:

>>4145122
yes, I'm thirsty

Anonymous

Anonymous Thu 23 Feb 2023 22:43:16 No.4146010 Report

Quoted By:

>>4145215
This post has been living in my head rent free. I was convinced that you were wrong and that I needed everything from 18-49mm because naturally I don't go to 50mm. Turns out that i was kind of right. I go straight to 50mm on my APS-C, which is 75mm. But yeah turns out for 80% of my shots with my standard zoom lens I really could just use a 50mm prime.

Anonymous

Anonymous Sun 05 Mar 2023 02:07:04 No.4150174 Report

Quoted By:

>>4145320
Do you have time to listen about our lord and savior ergonomics?

cANON

View Same Google ImgOps iqdb SauceNAO KEN_6082-1200.jpg, 162KiB, 884x1200

cANON Tue 07 Mar 2023 01:47:17 No.4150994 Report

Quoted By:

>>4145320
Hey the SL Rebels don't look half bad.
The average Canon lens looks like ass I'll admit.
>>4145122
Yes, I need more reach.
28-135mm IS USM FTW, fuck your bokeh. Horrible build quality and focus ring feel though, the 35-135mm was superior but the stabilization is necessary with full frame if you want any usable depth of field.

Anonymous

Anonymous Tue 07 Mar 2023 03:51:43 No.4151036 Report

Quoted By:

>>4145278
Amazing shot gramps, i am 43, don't let these skids get you down, been here since I was 25.

Anonymous

Anonymous Tue 07 Mar 2023 03:58:08 No.4151040 Report

Quoted By: >>4151064

>>4145696
How much zoom do you need for vacation snapshitting?

cinefag !CiNE/YT/e6

cinefag !CiNE/YT/e6 Tue 07 Mar 2023 04:04:17 No.4151042 Report

Quoted By: >>4151079

>>4145696
>>4145726
Superzooms are underrated, get it. Or better yet, get a 30X camcorder.

Anonymous

Anonymous Tue 07 Mar 2023 05:21:41 No.4151064 Report

Quoted By:

>>4151040
Well, it’s the not knowing that’s the whole point doesn’t it? What if I say some thing that needs 240? Or anything in between. If I wanna travel kind of late, I don’t wanna pack 3-4 lenses. I don’t know I feel weird about this, I either want one do everything poorly lens, or I just wanna bring all dozen of my lenses or whatever. I know it doesn’t make sense, but it is what it is

Anonymous

Anonymous Tue 07 Mar 2023 05:40:11 No.4151079 Report

Quoted By:

>>4151042
Bro they don’t even sell camcorders in stores anymore lol, my mom had one growing up it was a neat little thing, used those baby cassettes. I should go turbogeek and get one of them oldie things.

Anonymous

Anonymous Wed 08 Mar 2023 04:38:26 No.4151565 Report

Quoted By:

>>4145122
Absolutely KILLED it together with my Canon 6D during my travels, before I sold it and got me a Fujifilm toy shit nonsense. Great autofocus tho but ehh... if my Canon has usable auto focus I'd stay wiv it innit. Good lens.

Capcode	All Only User Posts Only Verified Posts Only Moderator Posts Only Manager Posts Only Admin Posts Only Developer Posts Only Founder Posts
Show Posts	All Only With Images Only Without Images Only Spoiler Images Only Non-Spoiler Images
Deleted Posts	All Only Deleted Posts Only Non-Deleted Posts
Ghost Posts	All Only Ghost Posts Only Non-Ghost Posts
Post Type	All Only Sticky Threads Only Opening Posts Only Reply Posts
Results	All Grouped By Threads
Order	Latest Posts First Oldest Posts First

On these archives

Your latest searches