>>4149972I like this one
>>4149973Uninteresting despite having potential. Either too wide or not wide enough, not sure.
>>4149974Completely run-of-the-mill, like a discarded shot from a reel in a John Carpenter movie.
>>4149976Snapshit, the colors are bland, the cars don't add to the picture but detract from it, it feels like not even you liked the scene yourself. Tighter framing could have helped, if the house was meant to be the focus of the picture.
>>4149978Cut at the wrong parts, tilted horizon doesn't help in this case either but for me the worst offender is that the side windows are cut in an uninteresting way.
>>4149980This one I kinda like, could be picked as a Windows wallpaper even if you got lucky I feel.
>>4149984Snapshit. See thing, point camera at it.
>>4149987Film is the only interesting thing about this one.
>>4149988Geometrically and chromatically weak (those are the two features that could have salvaged this shot)
>>4149990Kek reminds me of Repo Man now that you mentioned it. The photo was so bland I didn't notice the generics.
>>4149991I think perspective is ruining this one.
>>4149993This one could have potential.
>>4149996Cool and well balanced. The aspect ratio helps too.
>>4149997Very odd framing even if the building is cool. Mental asylum? Hills were used in place of fences sometimes and it reminds me of that.
>>4149998Not bad, kinda New Topoish.
>>4149999 (Checked)At a different time of the day it could be better I think, without that shadow in that particular position. Takes up too much.
>>4150000 (Checked)Good in a New Topo-ish way too.
>>4150003Lacks a bit of spice but not bad.
>>4150005Pretty good.
>>4150006>>4150007Tree shadow ruins it imo, version with fence is superior though. Not sure you could do anything about it save for bringing a blonde or a pair of redheads (with barn doors).
>>4150009>>4150012These ones have 70s family album vibes to them.
>>4150013>>4150015>>4150016Unphotogenic subjects
