>>4159708>You fucking nigger,are you mad? are you finally starting to realize how dumb and uneducated you are?
you seem just a tiny bit agitated there cowboy! is it because you finally realize how dumb you are so you are now resorting to baseless insults and rage?!
the only one ever getting mocked, was you. remember that. just remember this when you finally decide to learn something about what youre so passionately trying to argue about.
>so-called 3d popthe only reason im even calling it ''3d pop,'' you degen, is because of mentally unstable, cognitively deficient parasites on this website, just like you, who use that term. the correct way to say it is to refer to refraction, diffraction and reflection values in relation to tonality control and tonal transition smoothness preservation in lenses. thats what companies like nikon do, thats what fuji does, thats what sony does, thats what canon does, thats what SK/phaseone does, thats what hasselblad does, thats what zeiss does, thats what leica does, thats what voigtlander does, thats what almost every ''quality-first-profit-second'' based manufacturer does, even fucking budget class companies like zhongyi, asahi and tokina spend money on this when manufacturing lenses!!!
guess who does not?!! thats right, your beloved, godlike sigma that makes lenses that are ''just as good or better than nikon or zeiss'' doesnt do it and they never did. neither does samyang and tamron only did it with their so called ''APO'' lenses. ONCE AGAIN, to put that into perspective, even companies like zhongyi, asahi and tokina spend money on it when manufacturing lenses!!!
anyway, im tired of typing this to you again and again but your fucking shitty ''3dpop'' aka. refraction, diffraction, reflection values are not ''pseudoscience'' you uneducated cokcroach. neither is tonality control or tonal transition smoothness preservation. you're just an uneducated parasite that thinks hes right. teenage mindset 101 probably a fat dirty NEET
