/p/ - Photography » Thread #4160860

[21 / 11 / 9]

1MiB, 1228x1818, PSX_20230329_210705.jpg

35mm thread

Anonymous Wed 29 Mar 2023 13:15:52 No.4160860 View View Reply Original Report

Quoted By: >>4160911 >>4160986 >>4161133

I've got my film back so I'll kill a gearfag thread.
Pls don't mind the white frame it's a way for me to identify my pics faster
>Rollei R35B + iso 400

Anonymous

View Same Google ImgOps iqdb SauceNAO PSX_20230329_210755.jpg, 2MiB, 1145x1765

Anonymous Wed 29 Mar 2023 13:16:54 No.4160861 Report

Quoted By:

Anonymous

View Same Google ImgOps iqdb SauceNAO PSX_20230329_210907.jpg, 1MiB, 1228x1818

Anonymous Wed 29 Mar 2023 13:17:59 No.4160862 Report

Quoted By:

Anonymous

View Same Google ImgOps iqdb SauceNAO PSX_20230329_210642.jpg, 1MiB, 1228x1818

Anonymous Wed 29 Mar 2023 13:19:00 No.4160863 Report

Quoted By:

Anonymous

View Same Google ImgOps iqdb SauceNAO PSX_20230329_210533.jpg, 2MiB, 1818x1228

Anonymous Wed 29 Mar 2023 13:20:24 No.4160865 Report

Quoted By: >>4160969

Anonymous

View Same Google ImgOps iqdb SauceNAO PSX_20230329_210355.jpg, 1MiB, 1130x1674

Anonymous Wed 29 Mar 2023 13:21:45 No.4160867 Report

Quoted By:

Anonymous

View Same Google ImgOps iqdb SauceNAO PSX_20230329_210156.jpg, 2MiB, 1228x1818

Anonymous Wed 29 Mar 2023 13:24:28 No.4160869 Report

Quoted By: >>4160913

Anonymous

View Same Google ImgOps iqdb SauceNAO PSX_20230329_210304.jpg, 2MiB, 1228x1818

Anonymous Wed 29 Mar 2023 13:26:27 No.4160871 Report

Quoted By:

Anonymous

View Same Google ImgOps iqdb SauceNAO 7219FB6E-FB1F-42F3-9333-4405876D (...).jpg, 5MiB, 4167x6224

Anonymous Wed 29 Mar 2023 16:30:24 No.4160911 Report

Quoted By: >>4160987 >>4161130

>>4160860
Scan from an 8x10 analog print (Ilford Pearl Multigrade B&W)
Shot on Nikon F3 using Ilford HP5
The HP5 meme makes the most sense in the analog printing world, I finally get it. The look and creative avenues you have with HP5 in the darkroom are truly unparalleled.

Anonymous

Anonymous Wed 29 Mar 2023 16:36:20 No.4160913 Report

Quoted By: >>4161136

>>4160869
Really nice color and mood. What film?

Anonymous

View Same Google ImgOps iqdb SauceNAO file.png, 1MiB, 883x599

Anonymous Wed 29 Mar 2023 19:16:49 No.4160969 Report

Quoted By: >>4161130

>>4160865
uh oh, what happened here? Looks like the lab did some auto adjusting on the scan and messed it up.

I tried really quickly changing the levels using Darktable and then boosting saturation to make up for it but it seems like the scanner tried to auto level all that black in the photo that it added a whole lot of noise. But I think this looks a little better. What do you think?

Anonymous

View Same Google ImgOps iqdb SauceNAO img068.jpg, 3MiB, 4447x6774

Anonymous Wed 29 Mar 2023 19:59:37 No.4160986 Report

Quoted By: >>4161147

>>4160860
my very first roll of film something like 2 or 3 years ago with a f3 + foma 200

Anonymous

Anonymous Wed 29 Mar 2023 20:01:49 No.4160987 Report

Quoted By:

>>4160911
Cool

Anonymous

Anonymous Thu 30 Mar 2023 01:47:19 No.4161130 Report

Quoted By: >>4161146

>>4160911
Dam pretty neat. I'm OP and I would really like a F3 or any SLR. With the rollei I'm blind shooting and can't change the lens (f3.5 40mm)
>>4160969
Oh thank that's neat, I'll change my lab, I've noticed the scans are poor quality. I've my developed film I will buy some scanner in the future

Anonymous

Anonymous Thu 30 Mar 2023 01:51:53 No.4161133 Report

Quoted By: >>4161134 >>4161148 >>4161162

>>4160860
>wasting time, money and /p/ catalog space with a dead form of photography
Stop acting like an early 2000s babyboomer clinging to film. Get a digital camera and move on ffs.

Anonymous

Anonymous Thu 30 Mar 2023 01:56:07 No.4161134 Report

Quoted By:

>>4161133
Shut up poorfag I'm born after film photography existed. Now sheete about how I am a hipster

Anonymous

Anonymous Thu 30 Mar 2023 02:02:05 No.4161136 Report

Quoted By:

>>4160913
Thanks, this one is Kodak colorplus 200. It's around midnight and the exposure is around 5sec (but it's me counting the time in my head while holding the shutter button so it's probably +-1.5 sec...)

Anonymous

Anonymous Thu 30 Mar 2023 02:41:34 No.4161146 Report

Quoted By:

>>4161130
bear in mind a LOT of labs will give you similar scans especially on negatives with a lot of black and stuff like that cause the scanner tries to do some auto leveling, it doesn't know that black should stay black, it thinks it needs to compensate for it. So if you're otherwise happy with the lab I wouldn't dump them instantly. something to consider

Anonymous

Anonymous Thu 30 Mar 2023 02:42:35 No.4161147 Report

Quoted By:

>>4160986
damn. this looks amazing, nothing like foma 400. Do you remember if you shot it at box speed and what developer you used?

Anonymous

Anonymous Thu 30 Mar 2023 02:45:54 No.4161148 Report

Quoted By:

>>4161133
How does this thread affect you in any way, faggot?

Anonymous

Anonymous Thu 30 Mar 2023 03:22:43 No.4161162 Report

Quoted By:

>>4161133
Oh no he doesn’t have the newer ligma A 65mm f0.5 dg dn ef fe mkii that reaches 60lpmm on the edges wide open his photography sucks.

Capcode	All Only User Posts Only Verified Posts Only Moderator Posts Only Manager Posts Only Admin Posts Only Developer Posts Only Founder Posts
Show Posts	All Only With Images Only Without Images Only Spoiler Images Only Non-Spoiler Images
Deleted Posts	All Only Deleted Posts Only Non-Deleted Posts
Ghost Posts	All Only Ghost Posts Only Non-Ghost Posts
Post Type	All Only Sticky Threads Only Opening Posts Only Reply Posts
Results	All Grouped By Threads
Order	Latest Posts First Oldest Posts First

On these archives

Your latest searches

35mm thread