>>4161021>filmlikeThis is post-processing, not the X-T1, not a cut filter. Clearly the blues have been saturated a lot stronger and the exposure has been greatly reduced.
Note that the highlights are close to white clipping, but are on the buildings, not at the sky as usual.
>>4161085 is an example where the blue correction is quite obvious due to haloing in the foliage. Other shots like
>>4161041 are pin sharp at the edges of the blue, almost giving the impression of image composition with poor masking/selection, and then also show blue saturated patches outside the sky. Or here
>>4161119 with feathering problems with the twigs at the image's right edge.
OP,
>>4161085 is my favorite. Then I thought
>>4161041 was nice in the lower half, although I don't like that you gave the steeple little room at the top, but also, since the arch is very dominant, would have benefited from a tighter crop that reduced the black parts of the image and the arc's conspicuousness.
