>>4161852>refers to ergonomics>continues to complain about controlsdo you even know what ergonomics are? ergonomics and button layout are two completely different things
ergonomics are the opposite of subjective. human anatomy is not subjective. everything that was ever made for us to be able to hold or use, from door handles, water bottles, cutlery, phones, mobile phones, tools, weapons, your mouse or the very keyboard you're typing your replies with... You name it... Their ergonomics of it all were perfected over time to almost perfectly fit the anatomy of the average human hand - now if your hand deviates too much from the standards/the average (is too big or too small), then that's on you, that's your problem and you should look for something with a bigger/smaller handle, grip or whatever.
Button layout on the other hand, has nothing to do with ergonomics or human anatomy, it's just a hardware design, button placement to make it easier for you to press the buttons on the camera with your thumb and fingers while simultaneously holding the camera - and if the ergonomics of the cameras grip and shape are properly designed, holding your camera will be easy and so will pressing all the buttons. (Also, obviously if a button is placed in a stupidly hard to reach spot, you will have trouble pressing it regardless of your hand shape and size and regardless of the cameras grip ergonomics.)
Sony, Nikon mirrorless, Fuji, Panasonic, Sigma, Ricoh, Leica... They all have the exact same simplistic, narrow and small grips and camera shapes, only differing in design and aesthetics. Canon is the only one who still does anatomically correct grip design and has the best ergonomics, even with their mirrorless cameras. The only thing that Panasonic got right is the shutter button placement on the grip, fits the anatomy of the human hand perfectly just like Canon but the grip itself is just as bad as your Sony, Nikon or Fuji.
