>>4166619>bla bla bla sea of meaningless words bla bla ''muh non planned street photography'' bla bla bla ''i know better than the best photographers in the world'' bla bla blabitch who exactly are you arguing with? i watched the best of the best do their job. i worked with the best of the best. i learned from the best of the best. and guess what? the best of the best only care about lenses and lighting and they care for that to the point of raging autism and theres a damn fucking good reason for that because they are the best for a reason. im pretty fucking sure, they know more than a sweaty, smelly, retarded, gearfagging ogre on 4chan.
>vogue faggotlearn how to fucking read you basement dwelling molerat mutt. i didnt only work with ''vogue faggots'' we did most (over 100 fucking shoots/sets out of 120-130) shoots on location and we didnt just shoot models and set up your typical static shoot setups, we did everything from football players, basketball players, singers, actors, world rally championship drivers, did full on film set type on location editorial shoots that took days to set up, we even drove for 8 hours with 3 different vans full of gear just to get right on spot on god fucking damned WRC rally stages in germany and then back to france the next day .. anyway please shut the fuck up
if 100000 different world wide known and praised photographers all go autistic about their lighting and lenses and about that being the most important part of photography, then it is fucking so for a reason. they are the best for a reason. they will fucking delay an entire shoot FOR FUCKING DAYS over a lens, while its being delivered to our location and will refuse to do the shoot without that particular lens. happened multiple times with different photographers.
just fuck off with your unplanned spontaneous (street)''photography'' nobody cares about that pseudo ''art'' bullshit
>>4166059dont listen to the retard invest in light and lenses instead of expensive camera
