Ultimately, to get nice photos you have to make them interesting.
>>4170053This headshot is fine and I don't really have much to say about it.
>>4170055Is alright but there's nothing really happening. And I would have preferred to see more of the squirrel's body.
>>4170057I like the low key edit on this. I can't comment on the subject.
>>4170058"better ones" probably because it's technically sound, i.e., in focus, composition is alright, but to me it would go in the bin because you can't even see the bird's face. It makes for an uninteresting photo we can't connect with.
>>4170060I sort of like this shot because I love the textures on the branch and on the bird, but it is lacking that special something in the composition. I would probably crop the left side out, make the bird a bit larger in the frame.
>>4170061This is a terribly underexposed shot with shadows that couldn't be recovered, and so the details on the bird are just lost. Would have been interesting shot, since the bird is singing in the photo, but the perch is uninteresting to me. In general I personally prefer more natural looking perches rather than manmade.
Hope I wasn't being too mean,
