an appeal to common sense:
look in the fuji thread, lots of photos
look in /rpt/ and photo contests, you see lots of sony and nikon mirrorless exif, fuji, micro four thirds, most canon shots are from budget contest canon rebel owners
look in the wildlife thread. the DSLRs in the exif tend to be much older budget conscious models, not top of the line. the more expensive, higher resolution cameras are all mirrorless ones that can use newer lenses that take advantage of the MP count.
you don't see a lot of people posting great shots from canon cameras and you don't see cANON and cinefag posting great shots period.
the exif gang on on /p/ is dominated by
>rebel sl3>rebel t8i>nikon d500>sony A7IV, A7RIII, A7II, A6000>Film scansthe 90d has been out for a while and while cANON and cinefag, who take no photos, recommend it constantly, not many people are using it.
based on this simple observation, should you buy an expensive high end DSLR?
>>4174705>It is appreciable and you know it lol, reach increases linearly with the inverse of pixel size.this is objectively false. megapixels do literally fucking nothing. pixel pitch is how you ignore how small the increase is. a 50% increase is hard to see even pixel peeping. doubling them gets you clear pixel peeping improvements. quadrupling them gets you a difference you can notice when looking at the whole picture. this is fact. megapixels mean nothing except in very large increases.
