>>4189945I think Terry's flash blew out more highlights than I do, I actually think getting the range of skintone I do with direct flash in the dark is one of my technical skills. Pretty difficult to do. I think some of his editorial work was alright, his work with Tom Ford is really good however stuff like his Kibosh book (which I own) is pretty bad. I assume that's the sort of work you mean.
>>4190121I think if it were my stone then I'd like someone to feel something about it rather than it be ignored. If it wasn't for that photo you'd ignore it. Nice that it makes you feel something so viscerally, probably means you're a good person. I dunno.
>>4190136>"doesn't have access to models" I only take photos of people that approach me to take their photo. I've never asked anyone. It's not really hard to access models of you did want to do that though, I mean it's literally their job.
>>4190145Like I said above I like some of his work, especially the editorial work. I feel like a lot of his later portrait work was too much about him and a bit boring and relied too much on his and whoever was pictured fame/celebrity. You get the odd one that's good or bad though. The Steve-o set was good, the Obama one was awful. In my opinion.
>>4190152I'm about 6yrs into nofap, unironically recommend it.
>>4190158Kibosh yes, vogue work no
>>4190164Sue for what exactly?
>>4190165Not a digits, log or shouldn't share post so I doubt it.
>>4190166That's not a gravestone, just some shitty pseudo-Hellenic decoration in a closed off private street. What sort of made it funny about referencing Sappho I guess.
>>4190179I think I the surface it is quite pathetic yea, but I think it's OK to enjoy it as that.
>>4190186Rapist? Seems like a bit of a bizarre leap that probably says a bit more about where your head is at than mine.
Pretentious I'll take on the chin though.
