>>4186094>lmao the a7RIII is a joke that dies when the push comes to shove, garbage weather resistanceit's still a good camera, so put a plsatic bag on it
>Fuji is inferior even in reach because X-tranny. Dedicated PDAF pixels make them even worse than they used to be.this is false. the images are not just usable, but stellar if you don't crop to extend your focal length 3x. xtrans has the same effect as having an AA filter - by the way, the 90d has an AA filter. good thing the lenses are affordable so you can just, you know, use the right lens.
>The 90d has le reach!we've been over this 9001x.
at the equivalent density of a 75mp full frame camera, it is doubtful that the 90d would somehow do much better than an A7RV given the low quality of canon optics and how 13mp equivalent is a borderline imperceptible difference. an A7RV has good digital zoom, a canon 90d is already stuck being zoomed in at the limits of professional grade image quality. and it's a shitty DSLR with an inferior viewfinder with half the functionality of the back screen. i highly recommend going for a fujifilm X-T4 or X-T5 if you can afford it for the vastly superior video, autofocus, and shooting rates and superior lens selection.
if you are going to be a DSLRnosaur the pentax K-3 II will feel similar to the 90d but has more features, ie: IBIS, IBIS based AA filter (what fuji wishes it used instead of a new CFA), an !interchangeable focusing screen!, multi-auto white balance, setting white balance off a previous capture, an expanded low light autofocus range vs the 90d, pixel shift super resolution mode, and best in industry build quality with the robustness and QC history of the K-3 series cameras exceeding that of the K-1 series cameras.
