>>4197877The corners and foreground of OPs image are in focus. It could just be two or three stacks, you don't need to stack f5.6 for maxxxx sharpness for 2500x2000. And, bear with me, it could be a crop from an image with a blurred foreground.
The entire foreground of bliss is kind of blurred
>>4197840Diffraction will significantly soften things like pavement detail if you shoot at the necessary f/22 and even then a non-retarded wide angle will still have 2-3 feet that are not in focus, normally requiring the camera to be raised just a little
Or crop the OOF foreground out because you have more megapixels than required and troll people by saying it's focus stacked
