>>4187371>banding editing a 14bit rawcolor banding is an artifact introduced during color correction when the starting file doesn't contain enough fine color info, which might be due to a low quality sensor/conversion system or compression
most cameras haven't been suffering from the first issue for more than 10 years, because sensor technology has improved that much since the advent of digital cameras, and raw files don't suffer from the second issue because, as
>>4187100 explained before, raw files don't contain any color data
you effectively can't get banding when shifting hue if you're working with raw files from a modern camera
>1 extra bit means you can differentiate twice as many colorsover the years I've come to understand that there's one simple reason why people on here argue so much about menial shit
they don't understand how it works
>how can that be true when raws are all the sameleaving aside that that's, in fact, not true, you don't understand how digital image sensors work, nor what goes into a raw file
