>>4188969Don't just think of the content of the photo, you really have to think of the quality. /p/, and internet photogs in general HATE to hear this but one of the foundation blocks of every famous fuck's career, even nothingtographers like bill eggy-le-stone, was their prints, and the immediate, in person, visceral experience of their prints. The sharpness, the apparent texture, what popped off the page, the richness of the color, things you can't even really photograph and do justice. That stuff.
That stuff, that is a novel experience, and has to be seen in a gallery, separates an instagram account from an influential name in art culture. If you can have the vision, the practical quality, AND a rich friend you might actually make it somewhere. Even artrepro fag has made money off building corners just because he had the print, and even if his content is a weak and small block he still has enough foundation blocks to put a shed on.
