>>4188704lightroom, lrc and photoshop have shit/basic color reproduction for most camera sensors, even thoough the program is SUPPOSED TO render their files in AdobeRGB color space with 100% accuracy, which is supposed to be only 4% worse than NTSC 1953 color space....
tip: start using Capture One
speaking of color spaces, what kind of monitor are u using? whats its main color space and whats the percent coverage of its main color space?
tip: if the monitor youre using/buying has less than 100% (99% or lower) coverage of the most basic sRGB and Rec709 color spaces, you should avoid editing with ti, because there's 99.99% chance that its panel is absolutely dogshit inaccurate.
tip2: for photo editing use/buy only monitors that have 100-140% sRGB, 92% or more coverage of AdobeRGB, 90% or more coverage of NTSC1953, 95% or more coverage of DCIP3 and 70% or more coverage of Rec2020.
are you having sRGB or Rec709 mode on when you view images and edit or are you viewing and editing in NTSC, DCIP3, AdobeRGB or maybe Rec2020?
tip: if youre restricted only to sRGB or Rec709, try to calibrate your monitor (if its possible OR if its not already calibrated) to 100% or more accuracy of the sRGB color space.
tip2: always edit in Rec2020 > NTSC 1953 > AdobeRGB > DCIP3. prioritise this exact order, based on what your monitor is capable of. either way, no matter which one of these you choose, they all have much wider color gamut than sRGB or Rec709 and they all cover 100% of the sRGB color gamut, which is what most people will be viewing your photos on.
tip3: avoid editing in DCIP3, because its blue and especially green color space leans too much towards yellow, meaning your blues and especially greens will be 11-16% inaccurate. Rec2020 covers 100% of ALL OTHER color spaces, NTSC 1953 is the second most accurate, closely follow by AdobeRGB and then the DCIP3 that leans towards yellow just like sRGB and Rec709. so if you can try to get a Rec2020/NTSC/ARGB monitor for editing
