>>4190187>>4190192I don't even necessarily disagree with anything posted in those comments, I just want to see actual examples. It is a photo board after all. Hell, I myself have even posted 40mp x-trans vs 30mp FF comparisons, for the exact same reasoning. I just think it's important to actually demonstrate claims, otherwise it just comes off as part of the anti-brand circlejerk. Anytime I make claims about stuff, I try to provide supporting evidence.
I don't think you have to be a pro at all to be able to form a valid criticism, but it is always interesting to me to see the different levels of ability. The recent 50/135mm beach portrait pro is a great example of why it's interesting to me. There are tons of better (and more successful) photogs than I that opt to use Fuji, despite all those (valid) concerns, but they don't seem to be too concerned themselves.
Like bayer vs x-trans is legit, but I think it's such a non-issue for 99% of shooting and for 99% of outputs. Stuff like technique, lens choice, processing, etc all matter so much more in my eyes that it's not even a point worth arguing over, even if I 100% agree with you.
