>>4189845Crop MF is also literally nothing, the difference between it and FF is half the difference between FF and APS-C, which was already so much "nothing" that unless you push the envelope in terms of printing big, cropping for reach and using higher ISOs, at base ISOs with typical consumer glass and print sizes, uninformed observers are not able to tell you which 300dpi print is FF or APS-C if you limit FF to printing no larger than the smaller camera, actually use noise reduction instead of rigging the comparison to be unnatural to fulfill some gearfag grudge, and stay under ISO 1600 for APS-C and 3200 for full frame.
How many people here, or period, have pushed the envelope of full frame, cropping for reach and shooting everything at ISOs that are without a doubt too high like 6400 and 12800, and then printing the result? Show me one person who has taken an ISO 3200 shot, cropped it to at least APS-C size, and actually printed that, and show me that print. And I'll admit that maybe they could have used a crop medium format camera for something other than bragging rights.
