>>4194006>Megapixels do not add photographically relevant reachThen why are you suggesting a D810? That's 3 more megapixels than I said to use as a baseline.
>Your crops in particular look like ACTUAL SHIT.What crops?
>>4194007>This is what cANON is talking about when he says megapixels add reachThat's not a crop, it's 800mm lol. I guess you could say it's an optical crop because a telephoto lens essentially crops your FoV, but I doubt that's what you meant. It's also edited in a very soft manner on purpose. The colors are also meant to mimic some 70s Soviet films. Pic related. It's no secret I'm enamored with Andrei Tarkovsky's body of work.
Have an actual crop for reach, with a worm overlay on top just to be cheeky.
>>4194008Looks good enough.
Also dogfag has an a7R3, that's more than 20 more megapixels than I do.
