>>4198389Cool vibes
I'm not very into overediting stuff, but that's just no >my thing
If it suits what you envision, then great
Also the edit is cool, it sets a mood very well
As others have said, it gives Blade Runner 2049 vibes
>>4198411It's too literal and boring
It gets nothing more than a chuckle, at best, but it's forgettable
>>4198423Technically okay, no mistakes here. But it's also forgettable, looks like a stock image or something you'd see hanged on an Ikea wall
It's generic, it says nothing
>>4198424Again: it gets a chuckle at best
And the colours are a bit weird, a bit too much magenta and blue (the finger is too saturated, and the blue/green in the corners and the light at the back look off)
But at least it shows a bit of your sense of humour, your personality
It's not good, it's a silly gimmick, but it says a bit about you
Maybe follow that path, you can use photography to express yourself
Don't get bummed out by this feedback
You're technically good, and this should help you make your ideas come to be
But it looks like you're trying to replicate stuff that you've seen before instead of actually doing something (you) want to do with photography
Find what interests you, find your style, what grabs your attention etc.
That's why this last photo, although it's not quite good, has this quality of being something more original, more you
Stop trying to replicate stuff, do what you're really interested in
And experiment more, because even the replicas are conservative
>forest with long exposure light trail from a car>sign and predictable contradiction in front of itI'm confident you can make really good photos if you're true to what you really want to express, anon
