>>4201255Personally I'd have illuminated the body since at first glance it just looks like a shell sitting there, but I know my snails always retract when light is shined on them.
>>4201257I like the scene, but the silhouettes of the people don't grab my attention.
>>4201267Pretty background colours. How did you get a dragonfly to sit still long enough to take the picture? The dragonflies around here just flit around like an ADHD zoomer.
>>4201273Dynamic. Like how she frames the bush.
>>4201277Nice scenery. You got the helicopter at such a perfect time too. I was going to say that it feels a bit unbalanced with all the foreground action stuff on the right side, but the more I look at it the more it grows on me.
>>4201279I'm trying to recognise when fill flash has been used. I think it has?
>>4201282Must be nice having such aesthetic friends.
>>4201330>>4201331Looking at these, I think I understand why film lenses are the way they are. I don't know what else to say. Sorry, to me, they are just pictures of cows.
>>4201335I like what you need with depth of field here.
>>4201410Telephoto landscape photography <3
>>4201419I like what you did with the on-shore lighting. Horizon is a bit tilted though.
>>4201438Man looks really short. I like the difference in tone between the floor and the man, although it looks a bit too much like a creepshot.
>>4201444Cute dog. I'm curious how the colour version looks.
>>4201549I like the action of this scene. I might be a bit too used to Fomapan and everything having more contrast, but this scene looks a bit overexposed.
>>4201552>>4201551Cute horse. How is Ektar 100? I'd love to try a roll but the prices are crazy.
>>4201553Nice scene. Very post-apocalyptic. I feel the framing would be a bit better if you took it straight down the row instead of a bit off to the side.
Now for my contribution. The way ducks feed is really amusing. I hope it's good enough to warrant all the criticism I gave.
