>>4201869Nah, that's pretty much true. Tested Canon's fullframe MILCs - they are excessively comfort to hold and have little tiny buttons, as of made for a woman. Grip is great, but the body feels tiny. Nikon and Sony have that feel of an industrial robust and crude machine, Canon feels like a home appliance.
>reviewer Imagine believing reviewers. 95% of them are paid in one form or another, or they get gear for free from manufacturers. If reviewers are saying something - then it's usually reverse, because why would they push some idea out of thin air?
All reviewers was saying that rotating screen is best
Which is nonsense. For any photography-only person a rotating screen is a worst option. A hinge or a dual hinge is the only proper displays.
All reviewers was saying that you don't need fullframe
Yeah, sure, buddy, I don't need 3x more amout of light in same amount of time, at all
All reviewers was saying that video features are important
Which is nonsense for most of photographers. Manufacturers just use video as a key selling point, while in reality most people don't need video at all, they need better batteries, better AF, better reliability, better weather sealing, better lowlight perfomance, better dynamic range, less noise and more information. While all of that is cost a lot to implement. So manufacturers just push a new video features and call it a day
>Just pay one thousand more for a new model, you need it, my friendThe list goes on
