>>4208707So you're propping up a company with much worse economies of scale than Google, and no better eco-friendly credentials (pixel phones are made from recycled materials and have replaceable screens and batteries), and spending more for a lower quality device that will have to be replaced sooner?
If the environment was your priority, then why didn't you just buy a pixel 6a and spend the money you saved on eco initiatives? And your phone would be more powerful, with a better camera, and greater android support for longer.
You're the ultimate in cumsoomer, spending extra for a worse product so you could get the "I virtue signal, but am actually a detriment to the cause I supposedly support" sticker of approval.
>>4208710You can't use film and pretend you care about the environment. Plastic single use consumables and toxic\hazardous chemicals, nice. And driving 35 minutes for a coffee? I walk 100 yards, 1 coffee for you probably has a bigger carbon footprint than all my transport in a month.
If you're not a farmer providing required food and materials, there's no reason for you planet killing scumfucks to live in rural areas. It's hedonistic as fuck and should honestly be banned.
