>>4211597It's not that being in a photo would make me uncomfortable, it's that I would like permission to have my image (my divine right and my property) used by someone else. Reasoning:
It's mine. Don't touch it. There is no fear or discomfort felt.
That is not anxiety. It is morals. Am I afraid if I tell you to respect my property boundaries? No. I just want you off my property.
>>4211601>because you can't man upAnd steal from other people? Your image is your property. Theft is wrong.
And why are you talking about "manning up" when the activity that is most typical of "street" "photographers" is using the most discrete cameras possible and employing tactics like hiding in the shadows waiting for people to pass by, shoving a camera in someones face and walking away as fast as they can, and talking about which areas are best for being ignored by pedestrians? Most street photographers seem like disrespectful cowards to me. Or else you'd shoot with a DSLR in a small town.
The only street photographer I respect, although he is still disrespectful, is eggy. He truly isn't afraid of being confronted, has genuine intentions, and respects peoples requests to delete photos.
Most "street" "photographers" are sniveling autistic worms who could never even think of being like that. All you do is shuffle around and hide an x100v in your coat like you're trying to get away with a crime. Pathetic. You disgust me.
