>>4219746Please explain why FPS is a priority at all today. Once, just for shooting the olympics, film SLRs achieved 13-15 FPS. it was considered unnecessary by anyone with any experience, more like a feature for interns, and not repeated again... until today, where spec sheet readers like you do all the marketing and that's all never-pro hobbyfags buy things for.
Unlike image quality, FPS is wholly replaced by a modicum of skill. Also video, lol, in any professional setting where video quality is truly needed and video is destined for devices that can keep up with the camera, line skipped 4k is nothing. You want raise ISO and need big screen quality you turn up lights like everyone else. People used to and still do shoot multimillion dollars on celluloid, duderino, I'm pretty sure other brands would gladly take better stills and more lenses than canon's crap selection than some meme video spec.
