>>4219055>pedo machinelmao the eternal fujislug mirrorlesscuck strikes again
It's a professional grade camera, not a toy camera like a pedo would use to lure children.
>You are not annie fuckin leibovitz and likely never will unless your dads rich and you love traveling more than having a life outside of traveling. You're a normal guy taking pictures of stuff that interests him.Annie Leibovitz is an early lifer and her photography isn't extraordinary.
>d likely never will unless your dads rich and you love traveling more than having a life outside of travelingAnnie Leibovitz is no travel photographer and landscape is the one genre where artificial lighting is the least useful.
>You're a normal guy taking pictures of stuff that interests him.Which is why you should have a set of proper lights with a remote trigger.
>And today, the only cameras that have any good computational photography features like live compositing and focus stacking are made by olympus/OM-system. It's not hard to find a good one under $500.>computational photographyThat's just an euphemism for fake imagery passed as a photo. Probably shops the alleged Apollo 11 landing site on your moon pics and all.
>Which is sadly, the same price and performance level as non-native glass, so it's a totally irrelevant brand fanboy-factoid.It's more expensive and often better performing and it's no factoid. It's an useful feature, having a vast catalog of lenses to shoot with. I have a Nikon lens on one of my EOS bodies right now. I couldn't do the same with a Nikon body. In fact I couldn't use that lens on just any Nikon body but a handful of bodies that are able to support it properly because unlike EF, F mount had an evolution since its inception, being a much older mount that predates many advances in camera technology. By the time EF was born most advances were either there or could be predicted, and it shows. Introduced over 3 decades ago, the mount had no changes since.
