>>4218659>how to avoid snapshitsdont
have fun
>what separates a good pic from snapshit/documentarian photos?option 1 and the only correct option: a good photo is simply good no matter how you arrive at it, luck or effort.
option 2: technically, by some philosophical measures thought up by people with a compulsion to measure their cocks and the cocks of others. studio sperg or editing sperg autism where you exercise control over the scene before capture, after, or both. the more effort and control you are credited with the more art it is because that makes it easier to measure your cock, even if your photos suck more dick than you.
and even then some fucking autist will say "this subject is/isn't a -thing i consider to be a penis shrinking/enhancing choice- so it's a snapshit* because art criticism, like art in general, attracts some of the most pretentious and worthless fucking idiots to ever walk the earth.
