>>4224220The took over of the bourgeoisie inevitably brought its negative traits to all creative endeavours: pessimism and boredom.
The reality of being a class inherently adverse to art and made of rigid social norms and schemes, in spite of every ultraliberal sugarcoating it tries to conceal itself with, cannot produde real talented artists. The bourgeois worships pragmatism.
What it produces is milquetoast midwits that invested embarrassing sums in their pointless academic education just to ascend another bourgeois hierarchy in diguise, sacrificed precious years away from a properly career of Profits and cannot turn their back on the disgraced path they've chosen.
So they find themselves talentless and stuck, and the generalised cope they sell to themselves and to the public is that "art is dead" and essentially there in nothing more to do, which is obviously bullshit and regularly proven wrong when, by virtue of accidentality, a real talent comes into the scene and rocks the boat.
