>>4224517Depends on subject matter. If you shoot stuff that doesn't move/doesn't move quickly, landscape, studio, still lifes, architecture, etc, gfx100/100s or iq4 150 is your best bet. S1r with pixel shift is a close second. If you shoot subject matter that moves more or you require exotic lens choices, high res FF is your best bet, z9/z8/z7, a7r4/r5, canon r5, or s1r.
In the past, you usually had to get a low res body for fast action, but that's not the case anymore, z9 and a1 both offer great fast af and burst rates as well as deep buffers.
>in4b muh LF film is GIGAPIXELS4x5 is completely mogged by high res FF due to grain unless using b/w tech films. 8x10 is super expensive, a giant pain in the ass, and not that much better than MF digital.
>>4224701>what about a used gfx50s?no ibis, slower burst and worse af vs high res FF, worst noise at high ISO, less lens options, and way more expensive.
>>4224883High res FF is your best bet. Pick model/brand based on the features and lens selection.
>>4225028>Hasselblad X2Dx2d is worse than gfx100s in everyway besides built in ssd.
