>>42689181. women who do nude shots and ligerie dont go anywhere career wise (or money wise) because they are overshadowed by the biggest industry in the world, the sex industry aka all the softcore and hardcore porn bullshit thats available on the internet for free... the market for that is oversaturated.
2. women who have portfolios in modest to revealing clothes, teasing fetishised parts of female body like shoulders, feet, cleavage, stomach/bellybutton, etc... always have steady growing careers no matter how good or bad they are at modeling or how good or bad their physique is or even how good or bad looking they are.
3. both of the aforementioned points apply to photographers too... photographers who shoot only nude/porn/whatever related category have over 99% chance of going down a failing career path, less than 0.001% of all photographers who shoot nude make it ''big'' (and by ''big'' i mean middle class or maybe, just maybe, upper middle class range income) and less than 1% make it at all...
youve just been around too many trash and/or desperate women giving you a false image of reality. if you want to earn money doing nude shit, softcore porn, ligerie or similar, just dont... youll just kill your name/face AND with it your career... seen it happen too many times since 2010 as the porn industry was growing bigger and bigger. if you want to make it, just do low end fashion and low budget portrait editorials until you build your portfolio and then go from there. i started barely 4 years ago with less than $5000 saved up, bought an old, beat up hasselblad h5d set with 2 lenses for 4k and then used the rest to buy the most ghetto chinese strobes from alibaba... in just 4 years i managed to push through enough to have 3 separate portfolio books (actual physical books) ready to go with me and enough money to afford a decent 82m2 penthouse apartment in one of the complexes in the main towns centre and a decent used 2019 audi a6. and this isnt even my end goal
