>>4322883Most phones come with 10-bit ADCs or worse. Shittiest digicam from 2010 comes with 12-bit ADC. So unless your phone features some sort of weird quad pixel bayer filter, colors would be worse, as you have 4x less of them. And even if you have quad-pixel bayer filter, there is no guarantee anyone have calibrated for this.
Low light performance is a whole different story. 2010 digicam would come with CCD or early CMOS which don't see shit unless its natural sunlight or studio lighting. Modern phone has modern CMOS with exceptionally well low-light performance.
Optics wise, phone optics are pretty remarkable... Except you get fixed aperture (even though there was some dude explaining that adding more restrictive aperture might actually degrade optical performance but I've no fucking idea what he was talking about because i'm not optical enginigger) and fixed focal distance.
2 or 3 camera setups are useless because they all feature smaller sensors and take shit pics. And no AF/focus adjustment. I personally only used ultra-wide and main camera on my 4 camera phone. Macro camera is a joke (main does better job lol), and idk what 3rd camera even does lol.
In other words, at wide angle (25-30 mm eq), there is no difference unless you're trying to get bokeh. Oh, and camera would probably have better colors and better image processing (because way phones process images is kind of disgusting, but you can shoot raw on android at least).
>>4322888>sell your laptop/pc because normal people only have phones I will never understand this. Phones are unusable even for shitposts.
>"megapixels do not matter, because you should stand further away from your prints instead of noticing the difference"You can make 9000 mpx camera, but size of cell would be so small it would be barely sensitive to light and would feature high noise too.
Other thing to keep in mind is 8K. 8K screens are 33mpx, so camera has to have more mpx to not look like shit on 8K
