/p/ - Photography » Thread #4310110

[27 / 6 / 1]

6KiB, 225x225, images (6).jpg

View Same Google ImgOps iqdb SauceNAO

Zach Sat 04 May 2024 17:41:35 No.4310110 View View Reply Original Report

Quoted By: >>4310152 >>4310167 >>4310342

Have you all actually tried these lenses? They're pretty cool.

Anonymous

Anonymous Sat 04 May 2024 19:05:46 No.4310152 Report

Quoted By: >>4310159

>>4310110
Manual Zuikos? Yeah I have a 50mm 1.4 and its great, but it has a very modern, clinical look to the pictures, not really what youd expect from vintage glass.

Zach

Zach Sat 04 May 2024 19:47:33 No.4310159 Report

Quoted By: >>4310171 >>4310411

>>4310152
Does it remind you of Zeiss glass?

Anonymous

View Same Google ImgOps iqdb SauceNAO SZ72_4417.jpg, 2MiB, 2000x1331

Anonymous Sat 04 May 2024 20:09:46 No.4310167 Report

Quoted By: >>4310168 >>4310195

>>4310110
far worse, i have them. they have a weird color cast.

Anonymous

View Same Google ImgOps iqdb SauceNAO 2413 091823 1-16.jpg, 2MiB, 2400x1609

Anonymous Sat 04 May 2024 20:11:31 No.4310168 Report

Quoted By: >>4310169 >>4310180 >>4310328

>>4310167
Canonet ql17 with porta 400, compare, to...

Anonymous

View Same Google ImgOps iqdb SauceNAO 2527 101323 1-29.jpg, 2MiB, 2400x1609

Anonymous Sat 04 May 2024 20:13:32 No.4310169 Report

Quoted By: >>4310180 >>4310193 >>4310328

>>4310168
...Lolympus. Different day, similar exposure tho.

Using them on digital there's a dull yellow/green tint depending on the lens

Anonymous

Anonymous Sat 04 May 2024 20:19:19 No.4310171 Report

Quoted By:

>>4310159
Not even close.

Anonymous

Anonymous Sat 04 May 2024 20:55:55 No.4310180 Report

Quoted By:

>>4310168
Nice colors

>>4310169
Wtf.

Anonymous

Anonymous Sat 04 May 2024 21:21:38 No.4310193 Report

Quoted By: >>4310230

>>4310169
Thoriated glass? I have a super-shitumar 50/1.4 which goes yellow over time

Zach

Zach Sat 04 May 2024 21:23:15 No.4310195 Report

Quoted By: >>4310196 >>4310224

>>4310167
Their color cast looks good on a t2i.

Anonymous

Anonymous Sat 04 May 2024 21:25:44 No.4310196 Report

Quoted By: >>4310199

>>4310195
No it does not.

Zach

Zach Sat 04 May 2024 21:27:14 No.4310199 Report

Quoted By: >>4310216

>>4310196
Well at least I have plenty of money to buy food and rent instead of using most of it on camera gear.

Anonymous

Anonymous Sat 04 May 2024 22:04:53 No.4310216 Report

Quoted By: >>4310218

>>4310199
Do you really think nobody here makes actual money? The shitty film camera above seems to come with a personal pool hall.

Zach

Zach Sat 04 May 2024 22:06:58 No.4310218 Report

Quoted By: >>4310219

>>4310216
Well after since seeing the infamous video of the photographer who uses his disability checks on buying cheap film, kinda.

Anonymous

Anonymous Sat 04 May 2024 22:07:35 No.4310219 Report

Quoted By: >>4310222

>>4310218
That was you.

Zach

Zach Sat 04 May 2024 22:32:28 No.4310222 Report

Quoted By:

>>4310219
Thank you

Anonymous

Anonymous Sat 04 May 2024 22:35:08 No.4310224 Report

Quoted By: >>4310225

>>4310195
It doesn't at all

Zach

Zach Sat 04 May 2024 22:37:14 No.4310225 Report

Quoted By:

>>4310224
Alrighty then, what vintage lens do you think looks good on the T2i?

Anonymous

Anonymous Sat 04 May 2024 22:41:57 No.4310230 Report

Quoted By: >>4310232

>>4310193
There are two main versions of the Super-Takumar, the original version had 8 elements and contained no thorium, but my usage had a slight yellow tint anyway. Maybe the later versions just have it worse.

Zach

Zach Sat 04 May 2024 22:47:02 No.4310232 Report

Quoted By: >>4310434

>>4310230
I've heard a lot about those lenses. M42 mount right?

Anonymous

Anonymous Sun 05 May 2024 00:42:41 No.4310308 Report

Quoted By:

I have the 55 1.2. Managed to snag one with a camera body for $150. It is a fun lens, but clearly vintage. Bokeh is strange and it has lots of chromatic aberrations.

Anonymous

Anonymous Sun 05 May 2024 01:02:35 No.4310328 Report

Quoted By: >>4310398

>>4310168
>>4310169
are you the dogfucker of /p/?

Anonymous

Anonymous Sun 05 May 2024 01:16:05 No.4310342 Report

Quoted By:

>>4310110

Use them in my Olympus om1 it’s part of getting that look from that era.
Using my modern Nikon primes on the f100 produces something that looks halfway between film and digital.
I much prefer film with these older style lenses.

Anonymous

Anonymous Sun 05 May 2024 02:21:44 No.4310398 Report

Quoted By:

>>4310328
No, that's your mother.

Anonymous

Anonymous Sun 05 May 2024 03:12:12 No.4310411 Report

Quoted By:

>>4310159
Not particularly, but Zeiss has a certain niche, and a lens doesn't have to be Zeiss-like to be good

Anonymous

View Same Google ImgOps iqdb SauceNAO MDR_1606-edit-5-4.jpg, 972KiB, 1920x1536

Anonymous Sun 05 May 2024 04:59:59 No.4310434 Report

Quoted By: >>4310464

>>4310232
Yes, but they'll adapt rather easily to modern mirrorless (DSLRs are S.O.L. though, since the back element gets in the mirror's way). The Takumar 50s are also known for their heavy flaring when wide open. Pic related is f/1.4.

Anonymous

View Same Google ImgOps iqdb SauceNAO MDR_1571-edit-4-3.jpg, 975KiB, 1920x1440

Anonymous Sun 05 May 2024 07:35:06 No.4310464 Report

Quoted By:

>>4310434
This is probably a better example.

Capcode	All Only User Posts Only Verified Posts Only Moderator Posts Only Manager Posts Only Admin Posts Only Developer Posts Only Founder Posts
Show Posts	All Only With Images Only Without Images Only Spoiler Images Only Non-Spoiler Images
Deleted Posts	All Only Deleted Posts Only Non-Deleted Posts
Ghost Posts	All Only Ghost Posts Only Non-Ghost Posts
Post Type	All Only Sticky Threads Only Opening Posts Only Reply Posts
Results	All Grouped By Threads
Order	Latest Posts First Oldest Posts First

On these archives

Your latest searches