>>4313653The only reason canikon have market share at all is legacy crap. Probably 80% of canon's market is boomers who financially have to stick with canon because of their $10k worth of EF lenses. Not because their cameras are good.
Sony's cameras and lenses are good. Sony actually has a lens selection that meets everyones needs instead of being a hard split between oversized bokeh whore crap and entry level junk without weather sealing (or whatever the fuck nikon is doing with super soft wide open consoomer grade entry level primes that are the size of sony GM lenses)
Seriously nikon Z lenses are a fucking embarassment. 20mm Z - softer than sony's, 2x the size. 24mm Z - softer and slower than sony's, larger. 35mm Z - softer and slower than sonys GM, same size. 50mm Z - softer and slower, same size. 85mm Z - only lens that is actually better than sony's.
Oh and on sony you can actually get compact primes that aren't non-WR plastic shit or jokes with noisy slow AF. Who cares if the 26mm f2.8 is thin, once you add the hood and filter to "weather seal" it its the same size as the sony 24mm f2.8 G kek
Why do you think canon is so deathly afraid of third party AF lenses on RF mount? They're not allowing that until they estimate that enough EF gear has been traded in for RF gear.
Why do you think there are no FF sigma lenses for nikon Z? Nikon is dying fast enough as it is, they wont allow sigma to do that.
Just look at what happened to nikon. the one and only reason they plummeted to a nearly bottom tier brand is because they incorrectly assumed no one was using AF-D lenses. So when they decided not to support them, they lost half their customers to sony.
>>4313483Nobody uses this crap now that cameras go over ISO 400, shoot outside and you have all the lighting you'll ever need. Almost nobody studiofags unless they are working under a larger corporate umbrella or are an early lifer. Realestate has gotten too expensive and most clients think flash looks bad.
