/p/ - Photography » Thread #4314463

[40 / 1 / 1]

145KiB, 1280x720, 30mpix.jpg

View Same Google ImgOps iqdb SauceNAO

Anonymous Thu 16 May 2024 19:24:42 No.4314463 View View Reply Original Report

Quoted By: >>4314464 >>4314465 >>4314536 >>4314592 >>4314595 >>4314627 >>4314704 >>4314734

>30 megapixels

Holy shit, it's fucking over, ha ha ha ha hahaha

Anonymous

Anonymous Thu 16 May 2024 19:32:49 No.4314464 Report

Quoted By: >>4314465

>>4314463
What good does all this effpeess do? Most iconic sports photos were taken with manually focusing, manual winding film cameras.

Are they preparing to replace the talentless hacks that are most sports photographers with sony/canon equipped drones with AI player recognition and just pick frames from HFR short exposure video feeds?

Anonymous

Anonymous Thu 16 May 2024 19:35:36 No.4314465 Report

Quoted By: >>4314467

>>4314463
30mp is fine. 240fps is pointless even for sports and wildlife. That said >>4314464 "most photos were taken with <shit technology>" is such a dumb take. People always use the latest and best to maximize odds. It's not about whether or not you CAN it's about what makes it easiest. Old photographers had astronomical patience due to gear. If you apply the same patience with better technology you get way better results and more of them.

Anonymous

Anonymous Thu 16 May 2024 19:40:55 No.4314467 Report

Quoted By:

>>4314465
Get a load of this Goldilocks

Anonymous

Anonymous Thu 16 May 2024 22:55:29 No.4314534 Report

Quoted By:

Rebadged Sony sensor alert

Anonymous

Anonymous Thu 16 May 2024 23:02:21 No.4314536 Report

Quoted By: >>4314541

>>4314463
Anything over 12fps with flash sync is pointless

My strobes dont even do 10fps. If you need more you are a shit photographer. At least megapickels are free zoom vs. carrying big ass optical zooms.

Anonymous

Anonymous Thu 16 May 2024 23:11:56 No.4314541 Report

Quoted By: >>4314543

>>4314536
>Anything over 12fps with flash sync is pointless [for me]
>If need more [it's because I am a shit photographer]
weird rules you make up for yourself, I don't envy your life desu, seems like a pain in the ass

Anonymous

Anonymous Thu 16 May 2024 23:22:54 No.4314543 Report

Quoted By: >>4314546 >>4314769

>>4314541
>needs to make up a strawman to cope with his gearfag consoomerism
Instead of putting words in my mouth, take the cock out of yours.

Anonymous

Anonymous Thu 16 May 2024 23:27:44 No.4314545 Report

Quoted By: >>4314635

>30mp

We are progressing backwards...

Anonymous

Anonymous Thu 16 May 2024 23:29:04 No.4314546 Report

Quoted By: >>4314552

>>4314543
>he is incapable of learning to speak for himself yet tells others to do the same
lol @ retard

Anonymous

Anonymous Thu 16 May 2024 23:38:38 No.4314552 Report

Quoted By:

>>4314546
There you go arguing with the turds up your own asshole. Heads dont go there - pull it out!

Anonymous

Anonymous Fri 17 May 2024 02:20:53 No.4314592 Report

Quoted By: >>4314684 >>4314769 >>4314988

>>4314463
>nooooo not 30 MP!!!!
Canon listens to their pro users, not Korean basket weaving forums. If that's their decision it's because the people most likely to buy an R1 don't want more MP. And a high resolution R5R is likely in the works for people who do.

Anonymous

Anonymous Fri 17 May 2024 02:37:13 No.4314595 Report

Quoted By:

>>4314463
Boomers said make it go BRRRRRRRRR

Anonymous

Anonymous Fri 17 May 2024 02:50:23 No.4314598 Report

Quoted By: >>4314769

If you think this release is gay sony is limiting C2PA to “loicensed journalists” only with their new firmware update (leica lets anyone use it)

Sure canon releases boring cameras for commercial, nonartistic sports/event photography now
But SNOY just established a LITERAL ministry of truth

Anonymous

Anonymous Fri 17 May 2024 03:14:16 No.4314609 Report

Quoted By:

Every camera doesn’t have to do everything. This will be a super solid dependable sports and pj camera. Cool. End of story.

Anonymous

Anonymous Fri 17 May 2024 03:44:46 No.4314618 Report

Quoted By: >>4314768

Actually I think around 30mp is the sweet spot, if you *actually need* more you really should be buying medium format anyway

Anonymous

Anonymous Fri 17 May 2024 04:14:52 No.4314627 Report

Quoted By:

>>4314463
less mpx - less noise, as pixel density is less.

cANON

cANON Fri 17 May 2024 04:33:20 No.4314635 Report

Quoted By: >>4314698

>>4314545
What do you want it to be?

Anonymous

Anonymous Fri 17 May 2024 12:51:43 No.4314684 Report

Quoted By:

>>4314592
Anon, the naming convention would be "R5s" like "5Ds"

Anonymous

Anonymous Fri 17 May 2024 13:59:29 No.4314698 Report

Quoted By:

>>4314635

69mp

Anonymous

Anonymous Fri 17 May 2024 14:10:12 No.4314704 Report

Quoted By:

>>4314463
>30mp
Good, as it should be, for most usage high mp is a meme anyway.

Anonymous

Anonymous Fri 17 May 2024 15:23:42 No.4314734 Report

Quoted By: >>4314748

>>4314463
>reused processor from R3
Uh oh stinky

cANON

cANON Fri 17 May 2024 16:01:25 No.4314748 Report

Quoted By:

>>4314734
The previous iterations were DIGIC 9's.
This is likely the first iteration of the actual DIGIC X.

Anonymous

Anonymous Fri 17 May 2024 18:20:36 No.4314768 Report

Quoted By: >>4314770 >>4314771

>>4314618
>if you *actually need* more you really should be buying medium format anyway

You don't know what the fuck you're talking about. MF is useless for shooting action.

The R5 has many perks of MF without any of the drawbacks. What canon should have done with the R1 is make it 50 mpix and compromise a little with the burst rate. Who the fuck needs 240 fps anyway?

This shit is basically R3 Mk2 and it's gonna flop like a motherfucker.

Anonymous

Anonymous Fri 17 May 2024 18:32:42 No.4314769 Report

Quoted By: >>4314771

>>4314543
he has something of a point though. 15 years ago you would've said that you don't need more than 4 fps. It all feels very arbitrary
>>4314598
Use anything else
>>4314592
Hard to agree when Nikon has 45. Cannon could have at least offered 36

cANON

cANON Fri 17 May 2024 18:34:27 No.4314770 Report

Quoted By: >>4314772 >>4314773

>>4314768
>This shit is basically R3 Mk2 and it's gonna flop like a motherfucker
Then what are you claiming the 1DX users are going to migrate to?

Anonymous

Anonymous Fri 17 May 2024 18:41:55 No.4314771 Report

Quoted By: >>4314776 >>4314811

>>4314768
>mf is useless
Skill issue. AF-C CH snapshitter.

>>4314769
You really don’t need more than 4fps, but its getting hard to find a 4fps camera that isn’t $20k medium format or an ungainly blob of insectoid-designed plastic. There is just one 4fps camera that’s good, and its the leica m11 with an inferior ORF instead of superior TTL view. Tech so bad it was hipster shit already in 1950.

Anonymous

Anonymous Fri 17 May 2024 18:43:18 No.4314772 Report

Quoted By: >>4314778 >>4314787

>>4314770
Z8 with a battery grip

At least nikon makes good lenses and could theoretically use the same mount for a larger sensor (just look at sony FE posting lower vignetting figures than canon RF)

Anonymous

Anonymous Fri 17 May 2024 18:44:56 No.4314773 Report

Quoted By:

>>4314770
>Then what are you claiming the 1DX users are going to migrate to?
R5 Mk2?

Anonymous

Anonymous Fri 17 May 2024 18:46:33 No.4314776 Report

Quoted By:

>>4314771
snoy makes a few true 4-6fps cameras but you need to turn on full quality raws to slow them down that much. they sell well and most people do turn on full quality raws.

cANON

cANON Fri 17 May 2024 18:48:56 No.4314778 Report

Quoted By:

>>4314772
>theoretically use the same mount for a larger sensor
They won't.

Anonymous

Anonymous Fri 17 May 2024 18:49:24 No.4314779 Report

Quoted By: >>4314784 >>4315113

Much needed reminder that viewfinder lag and shutter delay are 10000000% more important than burst modes. Burst modes are actually a cope for laggy viewfinders and long shutter delays. A skilled photographer with a lagless OVF and mechanical, instant release shutter can reliably take a photo of the exact moment they want.

You are raping your CF card and wasting hours culling entirely because EVFs and jap UX concerns in general are inferior and japs are too disconnected from reality to prioritize UX.

Anonymous

Anonymous Fri 17 May 2024 19:10:11 No.4314784 Report

Quoted By: >>4315113

>>4314779
>fastest possible human reaction time is 150 ms
You think the pros internally dial in their own lag and shoot early to offset it?

Anonymous

Anonymous Fri 17 May 2024 19:20:26 No.4314787 Report

Quoted By:

>>4314772
Z8 with a battery grip makes zero sense. It's bigger and heavier than a Z9 at that point. Just use a Z9 or carry extra batteries.

Anonymous

Anonymous Fri 17 May 2024 20:41:42 No.4314811 Report

Quoted By: >>4314989

>>4314771
you need more than 4 fps for macro, wildlife and sports

Anonymous

Anonymous Sat 18 May 2024 14:07:44 No.4314988 Report

Quoted By:

>>4314592
if i want resolution i would go Hassleblad not shit Canon.

Anonymous

Anonymous Sat 18 May 2024 14:29:13 No.4314989 Report

Quoted By: >>4315183

>>4314811
Wrong

Anonymous

Anonymous Sat 18 May 2024 22:04:06 No.4315113 Report

Quoted By:

>>4314784
No, >>4314779 is just a dumb LARPer who forgets that cameras are ultimately just tools.

Anonymous

Anonymous Sun 19 May 2024 02:47:19 No.4315183 Report

Quoted By:

>>4314989
I am not wrong. I'm willing to be you have no photos in any of those genres

Anonymous

Anonymous Sun 19 May 2024 07:59:29 No.4315223 Report

Quoted By:

Muh camera takes about 1 picture/month

Capcode	All Only User Posts Only Verified Posts Only Moderator Posts Only Manager Posts Only Admin Posts Only Developer Posts Only Founder Posts
Show Posts	All Only With Images Only Without Images Only Spoiler Images Only Non-Spoiler Images
Deleted Posts	All Only Deleted Posts Only Non-Deleted Posts
Ghost Posts	All Only Ghost Posts Only Non-Ghost Posts
Post Type	All Only Sticky Threads Only Opening Posts Only Reply Posts
Results	All Grouped By Threads
Order	Latest Posts First Oldest Posts First

On these archives

Your latest searches