>>4317876Its fucking sigma. you think they can design a good lens? they have designed maybe ONE lens that is both good and small, and it's a short telephoto that still needs distortion correction.
sony released the smallest ever 24-70 f2.8, the smallest ever 16-35 f2.8, a 70-200 f4 0.5x macro that's smaller than all but a non-macro extended canon version, a set of small premium primes that are the size of DSLR budget lenses but 2x sharper and arent pushed forward by the mirror box, a 20mm f1.8 that is sharper than nikons but half the size (also sharper, and smaller even plus camera, than nikon's F mount 20mm), the f1.4 GM primes are the size of nikon's f1.8 S primes, their 50mm f1.2 is the smallest ever made without being a baby butt soft leicastyle "noct" and vignettes LESS than canon's (the largest)... you're looking at the wrong lens maker if you want small lenses. Sony first party glass is consistently smaller, sharper, and faster - other companies just don't have the expertise to get the most out of mirrorless.
Canonikon be like
"We made a 26mm/28mm pancake, with hilarious compromises like 3 stop vignetting+noisy slow AF and no WR, aaaaand thats it next lens will be wedding zoom/astrophotography boat anchor! did someone say $20,000 telephoto prime? Oh yeah baby we're making another one of those next"
