>>4318608Reuters and getty don't have a contract with canon, they let you use whatever
>a larp>a rant about some gearfag shit#2 brand, after the historical inertia boomer blobs
Like apple shit is still better than anything microshit makes no matter how many offices in bumfuck nowhere are locked into MS office by compatibility issues. #2 brand.
>NO SON YIS BAD BECAUSE... STAR EATERFixed on a7iv on+only affected "serious astrophotography" (irrelevant nerds playing pretend NASA) anyways. How nice of sony to fix a total fucking non issue that was affecting 4 people doing retarded shit (stacking 500 20 second exposures taken through their shitty telescopes)
>BECAUSE... FORCED RAW SOMETHING SOMETHING!??!?!??Like this forced raw something something?
https://blog.kasson.com/nikon-z6-7/nikon-z7-lenr/I guess there's some drama over shading correction? You can turn that off and just do it in lightroom you know, shading correction is for video/jpegs, or, dont miss exposure 3 stops and complain that your photo looks like shit.
>i agreeThat Z primes are oversized for what they are? A 1.8 the size of a competing 1.4... no wonder niggon is plummeting in market share so fast they're set to be overtaken by fucking OM SHITSTEM in their home country and fucking FUJI globally. That, and non-functional AF lmao.
>but i went to a wildlife preserve in north dakota and the poorfag boomers there...Don't care about those retards
The vast majority of pros are canon or sony
The vast majority of people period are on canon or sony
#1: Canon. Sports photography king + 30 years of high speed lenses. Sensor quality be damned, NFL photogs gotta get the shot.
#2: Sony. Superior technology, Smaller, higher quality, only global shutter on FF, best cameras in existence (A7RV, A1, A9II, A9III). Only not beating canon because they don't have 30 years of EF mount historical inertia and the retained customers that comes with (they cant afford to switch)
