>>4321019>film cant be fakedoption 1: lost original negatives or original negatives in possession of propaganda agency, public only sees altered prints/copies or altered scans
option 2: altered or studio fake ultra-high-res digital photos projected through the camera and exposed as if they are original negatives (ordinary, ISO 50+ film and color film is significantly lower resolution than digital all the way up to 4x5 cameras, especially after the image passes through the lenses that usually go on film cameras)
option 3: original negatives were exposed in an indoor studio setting or outdoor set with actors and props and thoroughly faked
photography has never been truth. it takes lots of careful analysis, a heaping serving of trust, and NON PHOTOGRAPHIC evidence simply to prove that the moon landing probably happened. the photography is merely neat. more valuable was it being livestreamed with an operation working at a scale where it would be impossible for at least one person not to spill the beans. and that's a historical event that the entire world was watching.
only an idiot would trust a picture.
>the government would never spend a whole day fucking around in a studio to lie to me. my tax dollars are 100% used properly. minor road repairs just cost a million dollars because that's the price you pay for 5 guys to stand around while one guy pours tar into a pothole. 
