>>4319452Yeah uh, the thing is, you already made the impulsive purchase, one roll at a time, and you have been desperately searching for a reason that you are the most holy least-spender most-getter of the church of dollar ever since
The church of the dollar is headed by a council of least-spender most-getters as determined by the board of the holy spec sheet (assigning any thing " je ne sais quoi" or "subjective value" is grounds for excommunication), hence you typically post about the ratios between dollars and megapixels, and features you will never use and don't need, but disregard anything like soul or fun. Specific to cameras, "rendering" and "the look" are antithetical to the church of the dollar's spiritual guidance. All things must be quantified into numbers to be measured against the most holy dollar.
Also see: people who seethe about the x100vi and leicas solely because of their price and their spec sheet and the ratios between sharpness metrics and dollars, despite these being incomparable products to everything else, and despite users of these typically keeping them for ten times longer than most people keep laptops and phones, which are, by the way, a subject you are more fit to discuss than photography.
