>>4323150>A6000 with kitt lensif lightness, compactness for EDC are priority and you count per grams, also cheapest. downside: sometimes, color needs to be tweaked via post processing for better skin tones. AF isnt A6400 level. kit lens has OSS, isnt that sharp as Sigma but very usable for EDC snaps.
kit lenses can be a total ass for people who require sharpness, but can be somehow mitigated by increasing the sharpness in post.
>A6000 with 18-50 2.8 sigmaif sharpness, 2.8, macro are of importance. bigger, bit heavier than kit lens.
in the apsc world, sigma is the lightest, most compact 18-50 2.8.
>A6400 with kit lenslighter, more compact than 18-50 2.8 sigma. body AF with AI, body is a just a tad bit heavier than A6000
>A6400 with 18-50 2.8 sigmabest setup if you want the more recent tech, the sigma sharpness plus 2.8 and macro, and if you're fine with the size
it will depend on budget and your perspective on what size and weight is acceptable for you. but coming from a dslr, sony apsc bodies are considered small.
https://camerasize.com/compact/#535.360,535.1049,809.360,809.1049,ha,tyou can also get a fuji body and sigma, viltrox lenses if you want the film sims SOOC, or just websearch and download paid for free VSCO or RNI presets for lightroom and you should be good for sony, even a6000 which I use.
