>>4323502I don't think there's too much headroom, I actually think it is composed fine. It is definitely under exposed though. The subject's face is lit nicely but is otherwise lost in the shadows, like the rest of the picture.
I just feel really claustrophobic looking at this, which isn't great as I get the feeling it is intended as a nice photo of somebody.
>>4323507This works well, but looking at your other photos I think unfortunately it is a fluke.
I wish his eyes OR the rest of his face were more exposed - one or the other.
I think you should try and stay zoomed for these, unless you have a subject placed nicely in the centre of a busier photograph.
>>4323508 more along these lines, but unfortunately he is underexposed and I believe even then it would be falling short because of how little you can see him. >>4323558I don't see much here besides some satisfying contrast. I definitely would have copped it down to either of the asian ladies as they are more interesting subjects than guy looking up.
Like it's a "nice" photo, but I don't get much out of it.
>>4323578The exposure and contrast is beautiful here, but I think the image is unbalanced. The building is cramped and my eyes wander to the grass because there isn't much to look at on the building - the image should be wider so it's not "photo of" but "photo of in scene".
>>4323717I recognise your style from other threads.
I like your photos, but i'm not sure about this one. It's good but you lose me in the bottom half - it's just unbalanced. I'd look at cropping it or I would look at wardrobe or posing your subject in another way so that there isn't a lot of business distracting from the image. That lion and those pants make it really hard to look at his face.
>>4323967This could have been a really fun photo if you shot it lower. It can be best not to shoot at eye level and I think here you lost some playfulness to the photo because of it.
