>>4328332Yeah some content might be a bit old but I, for one, can still see a hindrance in using RAW for *workflow* and *deadline* reasons, but that's just me! Why don't you read his articles on composition? or the one about affording anything? Hell, his 2006 blog about apple computers still makes a lot of sense. His ramblings about things being made in china seems kinda outdated though.
What's the problem of recommeding a cheap DSLR? They might suck for you but they can get the job done. If you love photography you can and will use anything but if you are doing it for a living then just get the one that makes you deliver your work faster (like R6 and beyond). I know people making photos with shitty Canon Rebels and they turn out great, they don't even know what lens they are using but engage in picture taking not gearfagging, that's Mr. Rockwell's point.
All lenses are sharp enough for commercial work as subject and composition matter the most. Sure, you can have even sharper lenses with better contrast and colours but then comes the underdog with an entry level camera but better knowledge and shits on you (better knowledge, not *more* knowledge), then he gets enough money to buy the latest and greatest and shits on you even more, that's the point of all this. I think ergonomics and minor industry standard settings matter enough for him to disregard the latest Nikon and Sony and just get the Canon.
What's the point of this thread? Discuss the guy and come up with a general concensus? If you prefer a different kind of photography but insist on discussing about the type of photography that you don't like then all I can say is "ok, zoomer".
