>>4329392This is film digitized with aggressive unsharp mask settings, most likely a higher speed film for shooting under continuous lights, good indoor lighting, not flash
Did you fags not see the scratches and dust on the negative? Or way there's an even distribution of colors in the grain? Digital noise is color blotches especially in detailed areas, not an even random pattern that's slightly more likely to show up in shadows.
There's also no moire or digital moire correction smears anywhere, and there were no digital cameras this high resolution in 1996. It's the same look as ~45mp and a square so I'm guessing a 6x6 medium format camera.
