/p/ - Photography » Thread #4329715

>>4329715
The nikon is soft as shit low budget lens thats worse than their 35mm f1.8 at f1.8. The rendering is a blend of softness and modern sterility that’s just ugly.

The sony and canon have no photographic flaws whatsoever and the canon doesnt even have focus breathing. The sony renders with leica-like character.

Nikon lenses suck as usual

Anonymous

Anonymous Thu 27 Jun 2024 01:45:39 No.4329723 Report

Quoted By:

>everyone wants a 35mm f2.8 for the zf
>nikon: but canon has a-*farts*

Anonymous

Anonymous Thu 27 Jun 2024 02:00:50 No.4329725 Report

Quoted By: >>4329727 >>4333979

I want that rf 35 1.4 so bad, but because of socialism I have to pay an additional 1000 bucks over the amerifat pricing.

Anonymous

Anonymous Thu 27 Jun 2024 02:06:18 No.4329727 Report

Quoted By: >>4329747 >>4329842

>>4329725
I've got the RF 24-70 2.8 L and it's stupidly sharp. I reckon that prime is insanely good.

Anonymous

Anonymous Thu 27 Jun 2024 02:40:53 No.4329731 Report

Quoted By: >>4329946

Looking forward to the rumored 35 1.2 S. It’s cool that there are more affordable fast primes in the lineup. Makes it easier for hobbyists to jump in with say a Z5 and have midrange lenses available. Before it was like “here is this cheap, perfect, but boring and slow 24-70, every other lens is $1000+ fuck you.”

Anyway, don’t like it don’t buy it. It’s cool that there’s options.

Anonymous

View Same Google ImgOps iqdb SauceNAO 35mm-F1-4-MTF.png, 2MiB, 2268x3402

Anonymous Thu 27 Jun 2024 02:46:33 No.4329734 Report

Quoted By: >>4329742 >>4329760 >>4329783

>>4329715
Optics are much worse

Anonymous

Anonymous Thu 27 Jun 2024 03:02:18 No.4329742 Report

Quoted By:

>>4329734
The 35 1.4 G was not an amazing lens. And comparing it to a $2000 Sony GM is silly. There’s gotta be an allowance for the price point. Do I think it’s going to be an amazing lens? No. Is it a good enough lens for the price? Sure. Somebody will love it. If you know better you’ll save a couple hundred more and get the 1.8 S

Anonymous

Anonymous Thu 27 Jun 2024 03:29:16 No.4329747 Report

Quoted By:

>>4329727
>i reckon
okay cletus

Anonymous

Anonymous Thu 27 Jun 2024 04:50:02 No.4329760 Report

Quoted By:

>>4329734
>Softer than the cheap old one
>Probably less 3d pop and microcontrast
dropped

Anonymous

Anonymous Thu 27 Jun 2024 04:55:34 No.4329762 Report

Quoted By:

>>4329715
lmfao Sony really does use a baby mount

Anonymous

Anonymous Thu 27 Jun 2024 07:31:41 No.4329783 Report

Quoted By:

>>4329734
nice photo, anon

Anonymous

Anonymous Thu 27 Jun 2024 08:06:20 No.4329788 Report

Quoted By:

>>4329715
>L lens
>GM lens
>budget non-S lens
Gee, I wonder

Anonymous

Anonymous Thu 27 Jun 2024 15:36:18 No.4329842 Report

Quoted By: >>4329848

>>4329727
After seeing the 24-70 compared to the 24-105 f2.8 I am not so sold on it anymore.

Anonymous

Anonymous Thu 27 Jun 2024 15:43:40 No.4329848 Report

Quoted By: >>4329849

>>4329842
Sold on which?

Anonymous

Anonymous Thu 27 Jun 2024 15:47:29 No.4329849 Report

Quoted By:

>>4329848
I guess you mean the 24-105 is better, but yea, it's also $1k more and is much larger.

Anonymous

Anonymous Thu 27 Jun 2024 15:51:45 No.4329851 Report

Quoted By:

>>4329715

by selling 26mms

Anonymous

Anonymous Thu 27 Jun 2024 21:18:03 No.4329946 Report

Quoted By: >>4334397

>>4329731
Im just waiting for the Viltrox Pro (f1.4) and LAB (f1.2) lenses.

Anonymous

Anonymous Thu 27 Jun 2024 21:20:12 No.4329947 Report

Quoted By:

>>4329715
35mm is my favorite focal length but all of these lenses are too large for me.

I think I may pick up either a Sigma 35mm f2 or a CV 35 f2 APO.

Anonymous

View Same Google ImgOps iqdb SauceNAO 2562_Minolta_Celtic_35_28_1.jpg, 60KiB, 800x647

Anonymous Thu 27 Jun 2024 21:33:00 No.4329955 Report

Quoted By:

>Minolta $20

let me guess, you need more?

Anonymous

View Same Google ImgOps iqdb SauceNAO Screenshot 2024-06-27 180942.png, 315KiB, 1535x924

Anonymous Thu 27 Jun 2024 22:11:22 No.4329968 Report

Quoted By: >>4329972 >>4329973 >>4329976 >>4329983 >>4329984 >>4333932 >>4333980 >>4334288

Why would you not just get picrel boggles the mind. Gear addiction is a poison. All the primes you need have already been made. The last new prime lens worth buying was probably the Sigma 135 1.8.

Anonymous

Anonymous Thu 27 Jun 2024 22:36:17 No.4329971 Report

Quoted By:

>>4329715
Since I only buy sub $100 Chinese lenses, I don't care.

Anonymous

Anonymous Thu 27 Jun 2024 22:38:44 No.4329972 Report

Quoted By: >>4330010

>>4329968
in this case yes its basically the fucking same

in many other lenses case you can keep your soft “character” junk. it only looks that good for stop signs at sunset.

Anonymous

Anonymous Thu 27 Jun 2024 22:39:04 No.4329973 Report

Quoted By:

>>4329968
That is a great choice, can we see some pics you've taken with yours?

Anonymous

Anonymous Thu 27 Jun 2024 22:42:45 No.4329976 Report

Quoted By: >>4330010 >>4330077

>>4329968
>a 135mm lens at f1.8
>worth buying

Anonymous

Anonymous Thu 27 Jun 2024 23:36:31 No.4329983 Report

Quoted By: >>4330010

>>4329968
This is larger even without the adapter, worse, and it's out of production. If both lenses were free would you still choose this?

Anonymous

Anonymous Thu 27 Jun 2024 23:37:54 No.4329984 Report

Quoted By:

>>4329968
lmao didnt see the price
>shitty old crap, needs adapter, $635 used here, consistently $400 and up for shit thats probably been dropped from 6ft onto carpet
>new one for z mount, $598 new
>same price
>same performance
wow smart shopper ur so anti consoomer lmfao

Anonymous

Anonymous Fri 28 Jun 2024 02:21:55 No.4329997 Report

Quoted By: >>4330012

>>4329715
one company makes copy machines, one makes playstations, and the other is an optics company

Anonymous

Anonymous Fri 28 Jun 2024 02:39:47 No.4330010 Report

Quoted By: >>4330019 >>4330077

>>4329972
At what year do lenses become soft "character" junk? Is it 5 years ago? 10 years ago? You are a stooge of camera company marketing.

>>4329976
Literally true

>>4329983
Worse how exactly?

Anonymous

Anonymous Fri 28 Jun 2024 02:40:39 No.4330012 Report

Quoted By:

>>4329997
Huh didn’t know Nikon made copy machines, neat.

Anonymous

Anonymous Fri 28 Jun 2024 03:00:03 No.4330019 Report

Quoted By: >>4330028

>>4330010
its not the age

every f mount 35mm that isnt bazooka sized is junk. this new lens is the price of the old one plus an adapter and is slightly less junk. most dslr lenses are shit - leica is still in business for a reason.

Anonymous

View Same Google ImgOps iqdb SauceNAO Nikon-35mm-f2D.jpg, 23KiB, 500x425

Anonymous Fri 28 Jun 2024 04:04:17 No.4330028 Report

Quoted By: >>4330041

>>4330019
you are, frankly, a moron. you say words and they have no meaning, they are just vague emotions your brain has decided are correct

Anonymous

Anonymous Fri 28 Jun 2024 04:38:07 No.4330041 Report

Quoted By: >>4330069

>>4330028
Oh so you say this one is good? It only autofocuses on a no ibis blob = less dr than micro four thirds

Anonymous

View Same Google ImgOps iqdb SauceNAO DSC_0689.jpg, 446KiB, 1816x1210

Anonymous Fri 28 Jun 2024 08:33:40 No.4330069 Report

Quoted By: >>4333883

>>4330041

Anonymous

Anonymous Fri 28 Jun 2024 08:42:49 No.4330071 Report

Quoted By: >>4330072 >>4330073 >>4334307 >>4334321

I hate lensfags, what makes one lens cost 500 and other one with almost identocal specs 3000?

Anonymous

Anonymous Fri 28 Jun 2024 08:47:44 No.4330072 Report

Quoted By:

>>4330071
The fact that people can and will pay. Next?

Anonymous

Anonymous Fri 28 Jun 2024 08:49:26 No.4330073 Report

Quoted By: >>4330075

>>4330071
>fujitoddler thinks that if two lenses have the same field of view and maximum aperture they have "almost identical specs"

Anonymous

Anonymous Fri 28 Jun 2024 08:57:50 No.4330075 Report

Quoted By: >>4330079

>>4330073
>Sonytranny thinks debtmaxing his card on some overpriced piece of glass makes his photos better, even though he never takes any

Anonymous

Anonymous Fri 28 Jun 2024 09:03:23 No.4330077 Report

Quoted By:

>>4329976
>>4330010
>>a 135mm lens at f1.8

could be good for astro

Anonymous

Anonymous Fri 28 Jun 2024 09:07:01 No.4330079 Report

Quoted By: >>4330080

>>4330075
Imagine being proud of not knowing anything about photography lmao

Anonymous

Anonymous Fri 28 Jun 2024 09:10:17 No.4330080 Report

Quoted By: >>4330081

>>4330079
Share yout photos faggot

Anonymous

Anonymous Fri 28 Jun 2024 09:13:52 No.4330081 Report

Quoted By:

>>4330080
You made the claim first, post your spotless photis with your $150 chinkshit

Anonymous

Anonymous Sun 07 Jul 2024 03:07:13 No.4333882 Report

Quoted By:

That Canon has very little focus breathing. I'm thinking it will be awesome for focus stacking.

Anonymous

Anonymous Sun 07 Jul 2024 03:10:26 No.4333883 Report

Quoted By:

>>4330069
based. I used to play Doom and hide pages of notes on mine (this was before my school restricted the use of graphing calculators for exams).

cANON

cANON Sun 07 Jul 2024 06:12:54 No.4333932 Report

Quoted By:

>>4329968
>All the primes you need have already been made
Find me a moderately sized 40-50mm prime for the EF mount that doesn't have an extending inner barrel.

Anonymous

Anonymous Sun 07 Jul 2024 10:25:45 No.4333979 Report

Quoted By:

>>4329725
you can literally hop on a flight buy it and return for half of that.
or ask a travelling friend to buy it from japan or the us

Anonymous

Anonymous Sun 07 Jul 2024 10:29:23 No.4333980 Report

Quoted By: >>4334023

>>4329968
>just don't shoot video bro

Anonymous

View Same Google ImgOps iqdb SauceNAO tamron3518.jpg, 45KiB, 600x600

Anonymous Sun 07 Jul 2024 10:54:52 No.4333988 Report

Quoted By: >>4333989 >>4333991 >>4333992 >>4334292 >>4334300 >>4334310 >>4334704

>>4329715
because it is a rebadged tamron you retard

cANON

cANON Sun 07 Jul 2024 11:07:33 No.4333989 Report

Quoted By:

>>4333988
>F mount
So why isn't the Z lens an inch longer?

Anonymous

Anonymous Sun 07 Jul 2024 11:12:34 No.4333991 Report

Quoted By:

>>4333988
Damn it even looks the same WTF

Anonymous

Anonymous Sun 07 Jul 2024 11:15:15 No.4333992 Report

Quoted By:

>>4333988
Now I am wondering how many of Nikon's and Sony's lenses are just made by Tamron...

Anonymous

Anonymous Sun 07 Jul 2024 12:28:11 No.4334023 Report

Quoted By: >>4334387

>>4333980
>photography

Anonymous

Anonymous Sun 07 Jul 2024 18:30:41 No.4334288 Report

Quoted By: >>4334292 >>4334380

>>4329968
>630$
>for a cunt from 2010 that been abused to the max
are you fucking retarded?

Anonymous

Anonymous Sun 07 Jul 2024 18:48:32 No.4334292 Report

Quoted By:

>>4333988
>two lenses are 35mm f1.4s and black plastic
>THE SAME!!!!!
Not how it works

>>4334288
More expensive with adapter, bigger than adapter, but people buying the new lens are the consoomer mind poisoning victims apparently. They should be like a total non gearfag and extensively research their MTF charts to realize the limga 35mm f1.8 ART is actually better at...
>Exactly the same fucking price a the new nikkor f1.4 - USED
A total non gearfag would absolutely come to this conclusion. This poster is not a consumate shopping addict at all.

The most brainless, normie, pure art, 0 tech decision is "buy the new lens because the old one was probably dropped 10 times before going on ebay".

Anonymous

Anonymous Sun 07 Jul 2024 19:06:35 No.4334300 Report

Quoted By: >>4334375 >>4334422

>>4333988
>because it is a rebadged tamron you retard
the tamron is f1.8 you retard

Anonymous

Anonymous Sun 07 Jul 2024 19:21:24 No.4334307 Report

Quoted By:

>>4330071

it is not they are making big profit, lenses have features, 3d modelling people might call it rendering, sometimes cheap kit lens is best, sometimes high end optics

Anonymous

Anonymous Sun 07 Jul 2024 19:28:17 No.4334310 Report

Quoted By:

>>4333988

which way nikon focus works these days, i do not know these things?

Anonymous

Anonymous Sun 07 Jul 2024 19:40:56 No.4334321 Report

Quoted By: >>4334327 >>4334378 >>4334477 >>4334582

>>4330071
With japan the expensive lenses like the nikkor plena have no/few optical flaws and are made with excellent QC so there's little lens to lens variation, and the cheaper lenses can be sharper, softer, or have more or less CA, whatever, from lens to lens and are generally less perfect.

With leica and voigtlander you're just being scammed. It's jewelry.

Anonymous

Anonymous Sun 07 Jul 2024 19:52:09 No.4334327 Report

Quoted By:

>>4334321
>It's jewelry.
don't you mean "jewry"?

Anonymous

View Same Google ImgOps iqdb SauceNAO 1717907720275831.jpg, 10KiB, 590x138

Anonymous Sun 07 Jul 2024 21:34:21 No.4334375 Report

Quoted By:

>>4334300
Huh?

Anonymous

Anonymous Sun 07 Jul 2024 21:49:20 No.4334378 Report

Quoted By: >>4334382

>>4334321

i have seen early 2000s bw-film scans of summicron pics, i would not call it´s effect as scam

Anonymous

Anonymous Sun 07 Jul 2024 21:56:48 No.4334380 Report

Quoted By:

>>4334288

do you mean that laymen sit stiff as dead when you take pic with that 35mm f/1.4

Anonymous

Anonymous Sun 07 Jul 2024 22:00:50 No.4334382 Report

Quoted By: >>4334384

>>4334378
All those classic lenses have been imitated to the max now. They are far from unique. People just ignore the imitations because without the brand name its just "funky chinese lens that doesnt even autofocus"

Anonymous

Anonymous Sun 07 Jul 2024 22:13:34 No.4334384 Report

Quoted By:

>>4334382
Not just imitated, but also improved in terms of sharpness, build quality etc.

Anonymous

Anonymous Sun 07 Jul 2024 22:23:55 No.4334387 Report

Quoted By:

>>4334023
eat shit

Anonymous

Anonymous Sun 07 Jul 2024 22:57:02 No.4334397 Report

Quoted By:

>>4329946
Same. The viltrox 16mm is incredible. Sets a high bar for the 35mm 1.2. Hope they don't keep us waiting too long.

Anonymous

Anonymous Mon 08 Jul 2024 01:12:56 No.4334422 Report

Quoted By: >>4334437

>>4334300
NTA but it literally says 1.4 on the lens you dumbass. LOL

Anonymous

Anonymous Mon 08 Jul 2024 01:38:49 No.4334437 Report

Quoted By:

>>4334422
well I'm a dumbass alright, I thought all of youse was talking about the tamron F012 and not the F045
regardless the F045 has a 14/10 construction while the Z nikkor is 11/9. plus one of them is for dslrs and the other is of course for mirrorless so I doubt it's a simple rebrand in this case

cANON

View Same Google ImgOps iqdb SauceNAO Nikon_Z_135mm_f1-8_Plena_Country (...).jpg, 91KiB, 1200x815

cANON Mon 08 Jul 2024 05:09:17 No.4334477 Report

Quoted By:

>>4334321
>With Thailand
ftfy

Anonymous

Anonymous Mon 08 Jul 2024 10:15:25 No.4334520 Report

Quoted By: >>4334579

>>4329720

>The sony renders with leica-like character.

So it's shit vintage lens then.

Anonymous

Anonymous Mon 08 Jul 2024 14:23:58 No.4334578 Report

Quoted By: >>4334604

>>4329720
soft doesn't mean bad. soft means useless for making wall textures for your angry birds clone.

Anonymous

Anonymous Mon 08 Jul 2024 14:24:59 No.4334579 Report

Quoted By:

>>4334520
Stand against the wall, wall photographer

Anonymous

Anonymous Mon 08 Jul 2024 14:32:28 No.4334582 Report

Quoted By: >>4334583

>>4334321
Thailand, not Japan. is any Nikon anything Japanese? Like the D800 was Japanese, but wasn't the D850 thailand?

cANON

cANON Mon 08 Jul 2024 14:41:33 No.4334583 Report

Quoted By: >>4334592

>>4334582
>is any Nikon anything Japanese?
You mean current?
Only the original Z6 and Z7 were made in Japan.
Even the D6 has been outsourced to Thailand since the closure of the Sendai plant.
Nearly all Z primes are made in China, with a few being made in Thailand.
All diffractive optics are manufactured at their Chinese plant.
The Z zooms are a mixed bag of Japan and Thailand (maybe some from China, I can't recall)
Some of the non-DO super telephoto primes are made in Japan.

Anonymous

Anonymous Mon 08 Jul 2024 15:07:00 No.4334592 Report

Quoted By: >>4334604 >>4334693

>>4334583
Thank god too. Just look at sigma for an example of japanese manufacturing
>copy variation: the brand
Or this
https://fstoppers.com/reviews/hey-canon-why-are-your-cameras-falling-apart-636447

https://www.reddit.com/r/canon/comments/17dw6h0/does_your_r6_ii_suddenly_lose_power/
Mmmm japanese quarity

US made cameras make a comeback when? Who is most likely to move production stateside? Sony, since they’re essentially an american movie studio company?

Anonymous

View Same Google ImgOps iqdb SauceNAO japanese girl cutting cabbage.jpg, 126KiB, 1000x563

Anonymous Mon 08 Jul 2024 15:30:35 No.4334604 Report

Quoted By:

>>4334592
>Japanese quarity
Oldfags know
Yet, america is never making a consumer digi stills camera, ever, only machine vision cams and security systems. we hate fun.

>>4334578
Optical softness is rarely good. It's an effect, like a diffusion filter, not something you want to be forced to have, but specifically for digital cameras. This is because the blur can confuse the bayer filter and make it look even lower resolution than it actually is. On film soft lenses are ok, they just look glowy instead of smudged.

Anonymous

Anonymous Mon 08 Jul 2024 17:54:20 No.4334693 Report

Quoted By:

>>4334592
>https://www.reddit.com/r/canon/comments/17dw6h0/does_your_r6_ii_suddenly_lose_power/
this was caused by the phone connection with the canon app, not the camera'a build quality retard

Anonymous

Anonymous Mon 08 Jul 2024 18:11:21 No.4334704 Report

Quoted By:

>>4333988
No it's not. The Tamron is a lot bigger and heavier and has more elements. It's also a lot sharper.

Capcode	All Only User Posts Only Verified Posts Only Moderator Posts Only Manager Posts Only Admin Posts Only Developer Posts Only Founder Posts
Show Posts	All Only With Images Only Without Images Only Spoiler Images Only Non-Spoiler Images
Deleted Posts	All Only Deleted Posts Only Non-Deleted Posts
Ghost Posts	All Only Ghost Posts Only Non-Ghost Posts
Post Type	All Only Sticky Threads Only Opening Posts Only Reply Posts
Results	All Grouped By Threads
Order	Latest Posts First Oldest Posts First

On these archives

Your latest searches