>>4334265>admits current "orange,green.blue" CFA's sucksEverything sucks compared to a theoretical ideal, or vision3 film, but digital cameras today have gotten much better. People often claim that they got worse. These people exclusively photograph stoplights, flowers, and cars in jpeg. They are wrong. You don't have an orange-green-blue camera you suck at using your camera.
>in camera NR sucksIt actually doesn't suck as much as it used to. Old cameras with forced NR were legit smear machines subject to errors while stacking frames for astro, like the pentax K1-II. The forced NR on EOS R and sony alpha camera is unnoticeable unless you are doing huge shadow pushes with NR off and pixel peeping hard
how hard? the zoom levels people use, 100% on cheap displays and 200% on retina, are like making a 10 foot wide print from a d850.
This is artistically, irrelevant. And who the fuck leaves NR off? NPC camera reviewers who feel a need for their gearfaggotry to be as detached from how cameras are actually used as possible. That's who. People who need to get the realest comparison between two cameras, down to shit that would be literally invisible in normal use, mostly so they can argue on the internet. Because if they left NR on the difference would be borderline invisible. If they just turned NR down for the EOS R or up for the other camera it would be the same.
The sony NR issue is even dumber, because it's long exposure hot pixel reduction, and only affects deep space astrophotography which is beyond niche. The version ii and iii cameras had a sloppy algo but the newer ones are quite good and wouldn't bother anyone who wasn't checking their space snapshits against a star chart.
