/p/ - Photography » Thread #4335022

[24 / 5 / 1]

141KiB, 800x800, img-2152_orig.jpg

View Same Google ImgOps iqdb SauceNAO

Name a better bang for the buck lens

Anonymous Tue 09 Jul 2024 17:23:32 No.4335022 View View Reply Original Report

Quoted By: >>4335025 >>4335028 >>4335121 >>4335123 >>4335142 >>4335344

I'll wait.

Anonymous

Anonymous Tue 09 Jul 2024 17:29:10 No.4335025 Report

Quoted By:

>>4335022
Industar 50-2

Anonymous

Anonymous Tue 09 Jul 2024 17:31:52 No.4335027 Report

Quoted By:

Pentax 50s are garbage wide open so,
Any Konica 50, any Minolta 50.

Anonymous

Anonymous Tue 09 Jul 2024 17:33:09 No.4335028 Report

Quoted By:

>>4335022
65mm super angulon

Anonymous

Anonymous Tue 09 Jul 2024 17:46:38 No.4335042 Report

Quoted By:

Tamron 35mm f2.8 ($199).

Anonymous

Anonymous Tue 09 Jul 2024 20:00:55 No.4335121 Report

Quoted By: >>4335124

>>4335022
So it’s a normal focal length f/1.8. Is there anything special about this particular one?

Anonymous

Anonymous Tue 09 Jul 2024 20:06:05 No.4335123 Report

Quoted By:

>>4335022
Any other of eleven gorillions normal f/1.8 or f/2 double gausses.

Anonymous

Anonymous Tue 09 Jul 2024 20:06:05 No.4335124 Report

Quoted By:

>>4335121
It's a 55mm prime lens. f1.8 is just the max aperture.

It renders really good photos for cheap. You can get them for ~$30. I think mine is the 'SMC' variant. It's also radioactive (not harmful).

https://www.pentaxforums.com/lensreviews/SMC-S-M-C-Super-Auto-Takumar-55mm-F1.8.html

Anonymous

Anonymous Tue 09 Jul 2024 21:00:42 No.4335142 Report

Quoted By:

>>4335022
Literally any old lens. Think, one day, every crazy pro f1.2 lens will be seen as identical because they will all be soft as shit on tomorrows 400mp full frame global shutter cameras.

Anonymous

Anonymous Wed 10 Jul 2024 06:04:11 No.4335262 Report

Quoted By:

ive been trying to buy a 35mm takumar but they're all like $60+ grrrr

fe2fucker

fe2fucker Wed 10 Jul 2024 07:14:28 No.4335277 Report

Quoted By:

chinon 50 1.7

Anonymous

View Same Google ImgOps iqdb SauceNAO 10.04.05-dd53eb4168a86abf5a2f991 (...).jpg, 214KiB, 1200x1200

Anonymous Wed 10 Jul 2024 07:29:24 No.4335280 Report

Quoted By: >>4335332

minolta MD 135mm 2.8

Anonymous

Anonymous Wed 10 Jul 2024 12:35:22 No.4335332 Report

Quoted By:

>>4335280
based 135mm gang

Anonymous

Anonymous Wed 10 Jul 2024 13:26:02 No.4335344 Report

Quoted By:

>>4335022
The Pentax 50 1.7?

Anonymous

View Same Google ImgOps iqdb SauceNAO ttartisan_f25056_b_m42_250mm_f_5 (...).jpg, 302KiB, 2000x2000

Anonymous Wed 10 Jul 2024 14:15:12 No.4335347 Report

Quoted By: >>4335351

TTartisan 250mm f5.6 reflex

fe2fucker

fe2fucker Wed 10 Jul 2024 14:24:37 No.4335351 Report

Quoted By: >>4335353 >>4335911

>>4335347
they should make that for leica with rf coupling...

Anonymous

Anonymous Wed 10 Jul 2024 14:29:40 No.4335353 Report

Quoted By: >>4335356 >>4335911

>>4335351
Afaik they chose the M42 mount, since you can easily adapt it to any other camera mount

Anonymous

Anonymous Wed 10 Jul 2024 14:39:26 No.4335355 Report

Quoted By:

TTartisan outplayed NiSI with that lens. They had announced it a while back, while TTartisan just released it out of the blue. The NiSi has m42 mount.

Anonymous

Anonymous Wed 10 Jul 2024 14:42:19 No.4335356 Report

Quoted By:

>>4335353
n-no rf coupling tho...

Anonymous

Anonymous Wed 10 Jul 2024 14:43:20 No.4335357 Report

Quoted By:

Nope, it was the other way around. The TTartisan has m42, while the NiSi has all the modern mirrorless mounts.
M42 is preferred obviously since adapters are cheap. Wonder if the lens is made at the same factory.. NiSi announced theirs earlier this year so it was a bit shocking to see the TTartisan one come to market first.

Anonymous

Anonymous Thu 11 Jul 2024 19:36:27 No.4335911 Report

Quoted By:

>>4335351
Agreed.
>>4335353
M42 is nice for DSLR compatibility but adapters add a lot of length to mirrorless.
L39 with rf coupling would be nicer imo. Easily adapts to M mount as well as virtually any other mirrorless mount. Also works on old Leica screw mount cameras which are cheap as shit. I honestly feel like cheap modern Leica screw mount lenses are such an untapped market.

Sugar !egyYvoBZV2

Sugar !egyYvoBZV2 Thu 11 Jul 2024 22:12:05 No.4335970 Report

Quoted By:

Canon 50 1.8 STM

Rikenon 55/1.4

Canon EOS 28-70 f3.5-4.5

Anonymous

View Same Google ImgOps iqdb SauceNAO 1695770778005042.png, 1MiB, 1484x1482

Anonymous Sun 14 Jul 2024 00:54:45 No.4336846 Report

Quoted By:

How long do I have to wait for your cope response bruv.

Anonymous

View Same Google ImgOps iqdb SauceNAO Screenshot 2024-07-13 210542.png, 77KiB, 961x266

Anonymous Sun 14 Jul 2024 01:06:27 No.4336855 Report

Quoted By:

razor sharp and beautiful character.

Capcode	All Only User Posts Only Verified Posts Only Moderator Posts Only Manager Posts Only Admin Posts Only Developer Posts Only Founder Posts
Show Posts	All Only With Images Only Without Images Only Spoiler Images Only Non-Spoiler Images
Deleted Posts	All Only Deleted Posts Only Non-Deleted Posts
Ghost Posts	All Only Ghost Posts Only Non-Ghost Posts
Post Type	All Only Sticky Threads Only Opening Posts Only Reply Posts
Results	All Grouped By Threads
Order	Latest Posts First Oldest Posts First

On these archives

Your latest searches

Name a better bang for the buck lens