>>4346240"diffraction smearing" and "ISO noise" ie. shit only camera nerds online give a shit about.
Clients aren't going to notice the difference. This is the kind of BS that only autistic photography nerds notice or care about.
Imagine the following scenario:
> meet cute photography girl> she participates in the local galleries, not pro, but enough to draw attention to her work.> but she uses a Olympus E-M5 III> she notices you with your camera and approaches you to talk photographyDo you say:
1. "Wow! You're pretty talented. People seem to really love your photos. I'd love to chat about photography with you sometime, can I get your number?"
Or
2. "Akshually, I see you use a deficient camera. If you zoom in on your RAWs to 200% you will see an unacceptable amount of noise, and if I use a loupe here, it is also apparent you used a non-optimal aperture. Your photography is unacceptable to my tastes."
If you say #1, congratulations, you're a normal fucking human and you're going to get laid, and have potential to be respected as an artist.
If you say #2, you're a fucking autistic retard and no one gives a shit about you, and any photography talent you have is null and void because you're a fucking retard that no one wants to deal with IRL. Which is why you come onto 4chan to gearfag.
