>>4344959Insecurity is all the presumptions you're making. Even my ex wasn't this obsessed with how men spend their money. Do you start imagining the length and appearance of peoples dicks when you see their cars too? Holy shit lmao.
And it is always about money with you people. If it's the exact same shit but cheaper you don't even care. You are obsessed with money. Pricetags form the basis of your ego and your entire value system. Your entire world view is based on how much money who is spending. Because you are always spending, and always thinking about spending. Spending is the basis of your society.
>>4344963>m-muh consoom!So money obsessed. Lmfao. You don't realize any point you had is invalid, you're missing the real issue especially if you saw the comparison like this
>>4344801You're class warring over shekels minted by the god-king of the central banks (they are worth nothing, even gold is worth nothing) when you should be realizing how industrial society has taken control of purpose and subverted it to cut you all up into focus groups and exploit you.
It doesn't matter how much you spent. It matters if you see purpose or not. A true gearfag buys something they know they will replace, a true gearfag buys something to accomplish something. This is you after being subverted by marketing and american culture, where opulence is mocked but status is still purchased, unendingly. The purchase is the purpose and your purpose is the purchase.
A non-gearfag buys something for its purpose.
Even if you only spent $5, when you say "i am a better, purer photographer because my zorki is so cheap!" you are THE gearfag. You define yourself by the purchase. The purchase is the purpose, your purpose is the purchase.
Also you are envious and trying to tear down people with more money to try and negate it because its easier to insult them than accept that their finances are irrelevant.
