>>4351111Nah, what I do matters and people care about my photography. It's a nice side hustle for me. But people don't give a shit what camera my photos were taken on. Some of my more popular prints were taken on a Leica X1, a 12MP APS-C camera from 2009.
But if your hobby is viewing pictures at 200%+ zoom and use that to justify dismissing entire camera systems, you're missing the entire fucking point. Because the point is to create compelling photos. At least, that's the point that coincides with people caring about your photography. And if you're missing that point, then no one gives a shit about your photography except other autists circle jerking over pixels.
Are m43 cameras as good as FF cameras, all else being equal? No. Does it really matter? Not really. My FF cameras help me get my low light shots easier than they were on the G9, with a little more flexibility. But I was still taking good photos on my G9, and if you were to hand me a G9 again today, I'd still take good photos.
You can't take good photos on a G9? That's a you problem.
Are you happy circle jerking over those technically superior pixels? More power to you. But my hobby is creating compelling photos, I'm a photography enthusiast first and foremost, not a camera enthusiast. The only reason I'm here arguing this BS is because I'm bored waiting to go to work.
