>>4349566>they don’t do it therefore it must be impossibleI didn't say that. All I am saying is making a camera digital makes it larger, it's inevitable. Just take a look at the Leicas, they made them digital and they got thicker. And that's after they removed the manual winder. You think they're wouldn't make them the exact same size if they could?
>I mean look at the rx1>Take the screen away and it’s a small cameraIt's thinner, partly because it has a fixed screen and also because it has a fixed lens. Yes you could go even further and remove the screen but most people wouldn't be happy with a fixed screen never mind none at all. Because of the complexity of a digital camera not having one isn't really an option, you'll be forced to tether it to a phone to adjust many settings. If this theoretical camera has an EVF then yeah it's doable, but again I don't think many people would enjoy it. Also the RX1 has like a third the battery life of an A7C.
>yeah yeah daddy snoy hasnt made it so it’s not possible, gotcha.No one has done it, and Sony is the smallest. Other than the Sigma fp but that thing's quite compromised and still just as thick.
