>>4350383lol you fell for the FF marketing.
Good job. You got tricked into buying more expensive cameras and you're probably not taking any better of pictures. You're cucked.
There are reasons to prefer full frame. "hur dur I need full frame to take professional quality photos" isn't one of them.
Actual advantages of full frame:
-Better low light performance if you're doing something that really matters. But IME, when you're hitting the barrier of MFT low light performance, it's close to the margin of the FF advantage anyway that there's seldom a time that it makes a difference. It's usually better to just creatively solve it (e.g. recomposing to get your subject into available light or just get good at flash). Also, AI denoise makes the difference a moot point.
-Shallower depth of field. But this is a gimmick. Sometimes it's a nice effect to have. A lot of people overdo it. Those f/1.7 primes on MFT gives you plenty shallow DoF, and if you still need more keep one of the Voigtlanders around. That'll give you really all the shallowness you need and if you want more you might want to ask if you're retarded. But when you start actually getting good at photography, you stop relying on shallow DoF to create interesting and compelling photos. It's ok, we all go through a shallow DoF phase.
-Dynamic range. But a consumer-grade HDR monitor shows like 10 stops of dynamic range, and print has less. The aging Lumix G9 has 12-13 stops. You'll be fine here.
Honestly, I just use my Sigma fp with APS-C zooms (and FF primes) because sensor size is seriously not that big of a deal once you get above 1" in size, and I really don't care to carry around heavy ass zooms. Zooms are for convenience, primes are for edging out marginal increases in image quality.
>>4350407Woops, another choice, not two more choices. I decided my other recommendation was retarded and deleted it.
>>4350412Are you a fucking idiot? You optionally create empty lines in between paragraphs, not sentences.
