>>4351256>its a conspiracy>nikon is actually betteronly 4 bodies have competent autofocus that is not an objective downgrade from a dslr
all 4 are dslr sized
3/4 have aps-c dynamic range for the most used ISO settings, making them effectively aps-c
the remaining 1 has an awful retro ui that is objectively worse than fuji's
only 3 lenses are anywhere near small. 2 are plastic, not weather sealed, and optically dogshit (but excusable because they're like $200 used), 1 is unusable for video and action, not actually weather sealed (the hood+filter solution doesnt work long term) and optically dogshit.
nikon used to be good, because they were putting sony sensors in much better bodies and IBIS on sony DSLRs weren't good enough to justify the SLT faggotry. now if you're going to buy the average nikon you may as well buy a fujifilm.
